Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 26.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Meas Tech. 2020 Nov 26;13(11):6343–6355. doi: 10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020

Table 4.

Summary of expected performance and recommendations for calibration materials in the use of low-cost optical particle sensors to measure the particulate mass loadings of different aerosol types.

Sensor performance by OPS type*
Aerosol type Aerosol properties Suggested calibrant Low-cost OPC High-end OPC Nephelometer
Fossil-fuel combustion Very small GMD, mostly non-hygroscopic, moderate absorbing RI (Bond et al., 2002; Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Chang et al., 2004) Calibrate with aerosols closer in RI, such as from combustion sources Will perform poorly due to the small GMD and absorption component of the aerosol Will perform moderately well, though it will miss ultrafine particles Can perform moderately well if calibrated using appropriate materials
Wildfire Varying PSD, moderate absorbing component of RI (Laing et al., 2016; McMeeking, 2004) Calibrate with aerosol of similar optical properties and GMD (ideally biomass smoke) Will likely undersize and underestimate mass due to the absorbing component of the aerosol; the GMD will change with proximity to the source, leading to changes in accuracy Will perform moderately well, though it may mis-size the particles as the properties of the aerosol change as the plume evolves Can perform well under certain circumstances; moderate error should be expected as the GMD of the wildfire plume evolves
Urban Varying GMD, moderate hygroscopicity (Hussein et al., 2004; Wehner and Wieden-sohler, 2003) Calibrate with NIST urban aerosol or collected urban aerosol Performance depends on uniformity of sources; large errors will occur as aerosol source (and GMD) changes Will perform moderately well to well, though it will miss ultrafine particles Will perform moderately well if averaged over a long period of time to normalize the GMD
Dust Large GMD, non-hygroscopic (Petzold et al., 2009; Rocha-Lima et al., 2018) Calibrate with Arizona road dust or collected dust Likely to perform well given the large particle sizes Likely to perform well given the large particle sizes Likely to perform well
*

Based on properties of the aerosol only and not external environmental parameters (i.e., RH).