Table 4.
Summary of expected performance and recommendations for calibration materials in the use of low-cost optical particle sensors to measure the particulate mass loadings of different aerosol types.
Sensor performance by OPS type* | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aerosol type | Aerosol properties | Suggested calibrant | Low-cost OPC | High-end OPC | Nephelometer |
Fossil-fuel combustion | Very small GMD, mostly non-hygroscopic, moderate absorbing RI (Bond et al., 2002; Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Chang et al., 2004) | Calibrate with aerosols closer in RI, such as from combustion sources | Will perform poorly due to the small GMD and absorption component of the aerosol | Will perform moderately well, though it will miss ultrafine particles | Can perform moderately well if calibrated using appropriate materials |
Wildfire | Varying PSD, moderate absorbing component of RI (Laing et al., 2016; McMeeking, 2004) | Calibrate with aerosol of similar optical properties and GMD (ideally biomass smoke) | Will likely undersize and underestimate mass due to the absorbing component of the aerosol; the GMD will change with proximity to the source, leading to changes in accuracy | Will perform moderately well, though it may mis-size the particles as the properties of the aerosol change as the plume evolves | Can perform well under certain circumstances; moderate error should be expected as the GMD of the wildfire plume evolves |
Urban | Varying GMD, moderate hygroscopicity (Hussein et al., 2004; Wehner and Wieden-sohler, 2003) | Calibrate with NIST urban aerosol or collected urban aerosol | Performance depends on uniformity of sources; large errors will occur as aerosol source (and GMD) changes | Will perform moderately well to well, though it will miss ultrafine particles | Will perform moderately well if averaged over a long period of time to normalize the GMD |
Dust | Large GMD, non-hygroscopic (Petzold et al., 2009; Rocha-Lima et al., 2018) | Calibrate with Arizona road dust or collected dust | Likely to perform well given the large particle sizes | Likely to perform well given the large particle sizes | Likely to perform well |
Based on properties of the aerosol only and not external environmental parameters (i.e., RH).