Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;41(8):2063–2071. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01037-2

Table 2.

LENA counts and their rate ratios for Recording 2 versus Recording 1 for the 8 low-visit and 14 high-visit infants with both recordings.

Event type Recording 1
 ± SD (median)
Recording 2
 ± SD (median)
Rate ratio
(R2:R1) (95% CI)
p
High-visit hours of recording

203 hours

Infant N = 14

High-visit parent-care time
 Hours, N (%) 54/203 (27) 42/203 (21)
 AWC 1644 ± 1852 (1002) 1888 ± 1882 (1368) 1.39 (0.99–1.94) 0.06
 Conversations 10 ± 10 (7) 13 ± 18 (7) 1.33 (0.92–1.92) 0.13
 Vocalizations 24 ± 23 (17) 26 ± 32 (16) 1.20 (0.85–1.69) 0.3
Low-visit hours of recording

110 hours

Infant N = 8

Cuddler time
     Hours, N (%) 17/110 (15) 13/110 (12)
     AWC 1609 ± 1786 (894) 2530 ± 2025 (1956) 1.33 (0.68–2.59) 0.41
     Conversations 7 ± 7 (5) 13.7 ± 13 (8.0) 1.49 (0.64–3.45) 0.35
     Vocalizations 12 ± 12 (11) 24.5 ± 22 (11.0) 1.38 (0.57–3.33) 0.47
Low-visit parent-care time
     Hours, N (%) 4/110 (4) 4/110 (4)
     AWC 1649 ± 861 (1496) 995 ± 1055 (763) 0.69 (0.29–1.63) 0.4
     Conversations 13 ± 10 14) 5.8 ± 8.6 (0) 0.39 (0.10–1.55) 0.18
     Vocalizations 40 ± 36 (35) 13.4 ± 16 (4) 0.29 (0.07–1.10) 0.07

AWC adult word count, Conversations conversational turns, Vocalizations child vocalizations.