Table 1.
Type of Study | Patients | Intervention | Outcome | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
Prospective | 39 terminal cancer patients | 10 g IVC twice with a 3-day interval for one week, followed by oral intake of 4 g daily for one week | Improved QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire:
|
Yeom et al. [120] |
Prospective | 24 patients with advanced cancer and hematological malignancy refractory to standard therapy | IVC three times a week at fixed doses 0.4, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.5 g/kg for average 10 weeks | QoL assessed by the FACT-G questionnaire:
|
Hoffer et al. [29] |
Prospective | 60 patients with cancer, anti-cancer therapy administered in 34 patients | 4 weeks of IVC therapy, median single dose 50 g (range 25–100 g) | Improved QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire:
|
Takahashi et al. [102] |
Prospective | 17 patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy | IVC for 4 consecutive days a week for 4 weeks, starting at 30 g/m2, a dose was increased by 20 g/m2 until a maximum tolerated dose (110 g/m2) | Improved QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire:
|
Stephenson et al. [28] |
Prospective | 23 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer | IVC once weekly: 5 g in 1st week, 30 g in 2nd week, 60 g in 3–12 weeks | QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire:
|
Nielsen et al. [27] |
Controlled retrospective | 125 patients with breast cancer on anti-tumor therapy (study group n = 53 ; control group n = 72) |
Study group: IVC 7.5 g once a week during adjuvant therapies for a minimum 4 weeks Controls: no IVC during adjuvant therapies |
Improved performance status assessed by the Karnofsky index and the ECOG scale during the 6 months of study * and the next 6 months of aftercare * Reduced intensity of complains (study group vs. controls):
|
Vollbracht et al. [105] |
Controlled retrospective | 39 patients with bone metastases, radiotherapy-resistant (n = 15 on chemotherapy; n = 15 on IVC therapy; n = 9 controls) |
IVC group: 2.5 g IVC during pain | Improved performance status assessed by the ECOG scale in 27% of IVC group and 7% of the chemotherapy group, while worsened in the control group | Günes-Bayir et al. [123] |
Case study | A 45-year old female with recurrent breast cancer | IVC 50 g twice a week for 4 weeks | Improved QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire:
|
Carr et al. [121] |
Case study | A 81-year-old male with recurrent pulmonary angiosarcoma | IVC 30 g daily for 1 week | Improved QoL assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire:
|
Carr et al. [122] |
Quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire unless otherwise indicated. * p < 0.05 compared to values before IVC therapy (if shown in the study). EORTC QLQ-C30—The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Core-30; FACT-G—Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; QLQ-PR25—Quality of Life Questionnaire–Prostate Module 25; MFSI-SF—Multidimensional Fatigue Syndrome Inventory-Short Form.