Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;58(2):807–828. doi: 10.1007/s11187-021-00474-9

Table 7.

Robustness checks: using the infections ratio as an alternative measure

(1) (2) (3)
Variables Whether applied Number of applications Credit amounts (log)
Panel A: Overall
Post × infections ratio − 0.639** − 0.797*** − 3.448**
(0.255) (0.268) (1.475)
Observations 1455 848 1455
Panel B: SOEs subsample
Post × infections ratio 0.145 0.672** 0.955
(0.153) (0.315) (1.192)
Observations 147 92 147
Panel C: Non-SOEs subsample
Post × infections ratio − 0.747*** − 0.767*** − 3.698***
(0.237) (0.143) (1.235)
Observations 1,264 635 1,264
Panel D: With previous application
Post × infections ratio − 0.106 − 0.153 0.979
(0.430) (0.645) (1.783)
Observations 537 888 537
Panel E: Without previous application
Post × infections ratio − 0.523*** − 0.524*** − 3.404***
(0.0955) (0.0974) (0.731)
Observations 873 324 873
Firm controls Yes Yes Yes
Deal characteristics No No No
Firm fixed effects Yes Yes Yes

(1) Clustered standard errors at industry level. (2) *, **, and *** denote significance at the 10%, 5%, and 1% level, respectively