Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0249324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249324

Table 2. In-silico functional tool scores and predictions for the five variants validated with Sanger sequencing.

Gene cDNA position Amino acid and codon change SIFT prediction PolyPhen-2 prediction Mutation Taster prediction GERP prediction CADD prediction Condel prediction
CFAP65 c.A3151G p.T1023A ACC⇒GCC 0; Deleterious 0.124; Benign 1; Disease causing 2,38; Conserved 18,70; Deleterious 0.763 Deleterious
RFT1 c.C1450G p.A463G GCT⇒GGT 0.49; Tolerated 0.001; Benign 0; Neutral 2,53; Conserved 4,96; Benign 0.042 Neutral
NRXN2 c.G3008A p.G849D GGC⇒GAC 0; Deleterious 0.973; Probably damaging 1; Disease causing 4,93; Conserved 29,50; Deleterious 0.831 Deleterious
TEP1 c.A1276G p.Y412C TAC⇒TGC 0.51; Tolerated 0; Benign 0; Neutral -8,29; Not conserved 0,00; Benign 0.050 Neutral
CCNF c.G1176C p.C363S TGC⇒TCC 0.06; Tolerated 0.939; Probably damaging 1; Disease causing 5,43; Conserved 27,30; Deleterious 0.707 Deleterious