Table 2. In-silico functional tool scores and predictions for the five variants validated with Sanger sequencing.
Gene | cDNA position | Amino acid and codon change | SIFT prediction | PolyPhen-2 prediction | Mutation Taster prediction | GERP prediction | CADD prediction | Condel prediction |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFAP65 | c.A3151G | p.T1023A ACC⇒GCC | 0; Deleterious | 0.124; Benign | 1; Disease causing | 2,38; Conserved | 18,70; Deleterious | 0.763 Deleterious |
RFT1 | c.C1450G | p.A463G GCT⇒GGT | 0.49; Tolerated | 0.001; Benign | 0; Neutral | 2,53; Conserved | 4,96; Benign | 0.042 Neutral |
NRXN2 | c.G3008A | p.G849D GGC⇒GAC | 0; Deleterious | 0.973; Probably damaging | 1; Disease causing | 4,93; Conserved | 29,50; Deleterious | 0.831 Deleterious |
TEP1 | c.A1276G | p.Y412C TAC⇒TGC | 0.51; Tolerated | 0; Benign | 0; Neutral | -8,29; Not conserved | 0,00; Benign | 0.050 Neutral |
CCNF | c.G1176C | p.C363S TGC⇒TCC | 0.06; Tolerated | 0.939; Probably damaging | 1; Disease causing | 5,43; Conserved | 27,30; Deleterious | 0.707 Deleterious |