Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;92(5):4053–4064. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05658

Table 3. Figures of Merit for Different SERS Methodsa.

method N RMSEP SEP BIAS
cAg@532 25 24% 21% 11%
cAg@785 35 19% 19% –4%
cAu@785 25 13% 13% 3%
sAg@532 35 29% 27% 11%
sAg@785 30 13% 12% 4%
sAu@785 25 28% 29% –2%
a

Normalization (as range scaling) was carried out to compare different methods; non-normalized RMSEP, BIAS, and SEP values are available in Supporting Information Table S8 (see Methods for details). N is the number of residuals for each method.