. 2020 Mar 18;59(7):5050–5062. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00280

Table 5. Relevant Bond Distances (Å) of the Minimum-Energy Structures of the [YL(tta)₂A] (A = NO₃^– and CF₃SO₃^–) Complexes in Figure 7 in DCM (MeOH in Parentheses) and for [YL(tta)₂(MeOH)] in MeOH^a.

	M–N_py	M–N_im	M–O_NO₃	M–O_CF₃SO₃	M–O_MeOH	M–O_tta
[YL(tta)₂NO₃]
A mono	2.657 (2.650)	2.612 (2.604)	2.522 (2.563)			2.387 (2.367)
B bi	2.712 (2.712)	2.695 (2.689)	2.657 (2.677)			2.378 (2.379)
B mono	2.694 (2.698)	2.627 (2.623)	2.484 (2.513)			2.352 (2.352)
[YL(tta)₂CF₃SO₃]
A	2.676 (2.678)	2.635 (2.631)		2.481 (2.502)		2.376 (2.356)
B	2.671 (2.673)	2.629 (2.626)		2.484 (2.505)		2.357 (2.358)
[YL(tta)₂(MeOH)]
A	2.653	2.598			2.604	2.360
B	2.664	2.603			2.559	2.361

Data for bonds of the same type are averaged.

Table 5. Relevant Bond Distances (Å) of the Minimum-Energy Structures of the [YL(tta)2A] (A = NO3– and CF3SO3–) Complexes in Figure 7 in DCM (MeOH in Parentheses) and for [YL(tta)2(MeOH)] in MeOHa.