Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 28;10(3):456. doi: 10.3390/plants10030456

Table 1.

Effects of site (S), form of N nutrition (F: urea or urea–ammonium–nitrate (UAN)) and/or biostimulant treatment (T: Glutacetine®) on grain yield, yield components and N-related traits determined by three-way analysis of variance (global ANOVA) and two-way ANOVA (for each form of N fertilizer).

Grain Yield and Its Components N-Related Traits
Yield (t/ha) Spikes/m² Grains/Spike Grains/m² TGW Specific Weight %N in Grain %N in Straw Total Grain N NUE %N in the Flag Leaf at Heading %N in the Flag Leaf during Seed Development Δ%N in the Flag Leaf
Global ANOVA Site (S) ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎
Fertilizer (F) ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎
Treatment (T) <0.08 <0.07 <0.06 <0.08
S × F
S × T
F × T
S × F × T
ANOVA Urea Site ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎
Treatment
S × T <0.08
ANOVA UAN Site ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ ⁎⁎⁎ <0.08 ⁎⁎⁎
Treatment
S × T

⁎, ⁎⁎, ⁎⁎⁎ = significant at 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively, p > F for n = 3. ∆%N in the flag leaf corresponds to the variation of %N in the flag leaf between heading and seed development (n = 9). NUE: nitrogen use efficiency; TGW: thousand grain weight.