Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 25;21(4):242–246. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2020.2716

Table 1.

The Prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, and Ehrlichia chaffeensis in Ixodid Ticks Collected from Vegetation, Humans, and Other Animals

Pathogens Pools of ticks collected from
Total
Vegetation
Humans
Other animals
Total by tick stage
F M N F M N F M N F M N
Ixodes ricinus
A. phagocytophilum 10/32 (172)a 2/4 (26) 2/7 (48) 5/62 (83) 0/4 (4) 2/30 (43) 2/13 (64) 0/2 (11) 0/1 (1) 17/107 (319) 2/10 (41) 4/38 (92) 23/155 (452)
B. burgdorferi s. l. 27/39 (220) 3/5 (35) 8/11 (63) 21/102 (123) 0/14 (14) 15/58 (72) 6/20 (94) 0/2 (11) 2/3 (5) 54/161 (437) 3/21 (60) 25/72 (140) 82/254 (637)
E. chaffeensis 0/32 (172) 0/4 (26) 0/7 (48) 0/62 (83) 0/4 (4) 0/30 (43) 0/13 (64) 0/2 (11) 0/1 (1) 0/107 (319) 0/10 (41) 0/38 (92) 0/155 (452)
Dermacentor marginatus
A. phagocytophilum 0/5 (10) n/a n/a 0/1 (1) n/a n/a 0/5 (8) n/a n/a 0/11 (19) n/a n/a 0/11 (19)
E. chaffeensis 0/5 (10) n/a n/a 0/1 (1) n/a n/a 0/5 (8) n/a n/a 0/11 (19) n/a n/a 0/11 (19)
Dermacentor reticulatus
A. phagocytophilum 0/7 (11) n/a n/a 0/5 (5) 0/1 (1) n/a 0/5 (10) 0/1 (1) 0/2 (5) 0/17 (26) 0/2 (2) 0/2 (5) 0/21 (33)
E. chaffeensis 0/7 (11) n/a n/a 0/5 (5) 0/1 (1) n/a 0/5 (10) 0/1 (1) 0/2 (5) 0/17 (26) 0/2 (2) 0/2 (5) 0/21 (33)
Rhipicephalus rossicus
A. phagocytophilum 0/5 (19) n/a n/a 0/12 (13) 0/2 (2) 0/5 (6) 0/4 (14) 0/1 (4) n/a 0/21 (46) 0/3 (6) 0/5 (6) 0/29 (58)
E. chaffeensis 0/5 (19) n/a n/a 0/12 (13) 0/2 (2) 0/5 (6) 0/4 (14) 0/1 (4) n/a 0/21 (46) 0/3 (6) 0/5 (6) 0/29 (58)
a

Values correspond to number of PCR-positive tick pools/total numbers of tick pools tested. In the parentheses are indicated the total number of individual ticks tested per a total number of pools.

F, female; M, male; N, nymphal ticks; n/a, nonapplicable.