Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;11:6969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86342-8

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis on primary outcome of clinical response.

Studies number Patient number Event in NA group Event in control group Risk ratio (95% CI) I2 P
Types of nebulizers Vibrating mesh nebulizer 3 698 191 of 358 177 of 340 0.99 [0.87, 1.13] 0% 0.90
Ultrasonic nebulizer 2 114 23 of 59 14 of 57 1.64 [1.07, 2.53] 0% 0.003
Jet nebulizer 8 778 255 of 390 185 of 388 1.37 [1.22, 1.55] 0%  < 0.0001
Patients with resistant GNP 100% 4 210 73 of 107 45 of 103 1.58 [1.24, 2.00] 0% 0.0002
 < 100% 9 1,240 401 of 629 324 of 611 1.24 [1.08, 1.42] 54% 0.003
Dose of NA  ≥ 800 mg/day 7 652 301 of 462 254 of 460 1.25 [1.04, 1.51] 59% 0.02
 < 800 mg/day 7 542 173 of 272 129 of 270 1.33 [1.16, 1.53] 35%  < 0.0001
Sample size  < 100 9 570 223 of 295 145 of 275 1.28 [0.78, 2.12] 40%  < 0.0001
 > 100 4 880 251 of 441 224 of 439 1.19 [0.94, 1.50] 63% 0.15
Study quality Low 9 700 273 of 351 186 of 349 1.46 [1.31, 1.63] 0%  < 0.0001
High 4 750 201 of 385 183 of 365 1.01 [0.89, 1.16] 0% 0.84
Study design Blinded 4 750 201 of 385 183 of 365 1.01 [0.89, 1.16] 0% 0.84
Unblinded 9 700 23 of 30 14 of 30 1.46 [1.31, 1.63] 0%  < 0.0001

NA = nebulized amikacin; CI = confidence interval; GNP = gram‑negative pneumonia.