Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 26;11:7002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86384-y

Table 3.

Frequency and bioinformatics analysis of identified variants in ANGPTL3 in FCHL cases and controls.

Variant Location Nucleotide change Protein change Bioinformatics analysis Allele frequency in the general population Allele frequency in our study ACMG classificatione MicroRNAsf
PredictSNP2a (probability) FruitFlyb GnomADc 1000 Genomes Projectd Normolipemic subjects FCHL subjects p
rs72649573 Exon 1 c.379C>T p.(Leu127Phe) Deleterious (82%) NA 0.00711 0.0020 0.000 0.003 0.313 Benigng NR
Intron 1 c.496-88T>G NA Neutral (88%) Not splicing change 0.000 0.003 0.313
rs111414963 Exon 2 c.565T>C p.(Leu189Leu) Neutral (88%) Not splicing change 0.00025 0.0008 0.003 0.000 0.313 Likely benign NR
rs531071581 Intron 2 c.607-120A>G NA Neutral (88%) Not splicing change 0.00013 0.0006 0.000 0.003 0.313 NR
rs72649576 Intron 2 c.607-109T>C NA Neutral (88%) Not splicing change 0.01079 0.0042 0.024 0.003 0.020 NR
rs72649577 Intron 2 c.607-47_607-46delGT NA Neutral (88%) NA 0.02222 0.0136 0.022 0.003 0.031 NR
rs185472483 Intron 3 c.835+41C>A NA Not splicing change 0.00032 0.0006 0.000 0.012 0.043 NR
rs747725081 Exon 6 c.961T>A p.(Tyr321Asn) Neutral (88%) NA NR NR 0.000 0.003 0.313 NR
rs12563308 Exon 6 c.1003T>C p.(Leu335Leu) Neutral (88%) NA 0.03550 0.0559 0.003 0.003 0.989 VUSg NR
rs199555921 Exon 6 c.1028A>G p.(His343Arg) Neutral (89%) NA 0.00016 NR 0.003 0.000 0.321 NR
rs763259225 Exon 6 c.1089T>G p.(Val363Val) Neutral (96%) NA NR NR 0.003 0.000 0.321 NR
rs145086916 Exon 6 c.1122G>A p.(Pro374Pro) Neutral (96%) NA 0.00077 0.0006 0.003 0.000 0.321 NR
rs72651034 Intron 6 c.1198+111G>A NA Not splicing change NR NR 0.003 0.003 0.989 NR
rs908541128 Intron 6 c.1198+140T>C NA Not splicing change 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.000 0.321 NR
rs34483103 3′UTR c.*52_*60del NA NA 0.33531 0.3484 0.276 0.102 < 0.001

hsa-miR-151a-3p

hsa-miR-7702

3′UTR c.*76T>G NA NA 0.000 0.003 0.313

NR not reported, NA not applicable, VUS variant of uncertain significance.

aPredictSNP2 uses CADD, DANN, FATHMM and Funseq2 as predictors.

bFruitFly. New prediction score 0.87 (wild type score 0.89).

cGnomAD. https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/

d1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Books LD et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1092 human genomes. Nature 2012;491:56–65.

eRichards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, Grody WW, Hegde M, Lyon E, Spector E, Voelkerding K, Rehm HL; ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30. Epub 2015 Mar 5. PMID: 25741868; PMCID: PMC4544753.

fPolymiRTS Database 3.0: http://compbio.uthsc.edu/miRSNP/

gTikka A, Metso J, Jauhiainen M. ANGPTL3 serum concentration and rare genetic variants in Finnish population. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017;77:601–609.