Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;11(3):623. doi: 10.3390/nano11030623

Table 4.

Performance comparison of room temperature CO2 gas sensing.

Materials Synthesis/Fabrication Method CO2 Concentration (ppm) Response Time Recovery Time Reference
Amino−ZnO nanohybrids in situ hydrothermal 500 206 s 354 s [13]
Reduced graphene oxide Hydrogen plasma reduction 1500 4 min 4 min [31]
Self-standing MWCNTs/alumina composite film Hydrolysis 50–450 53.7 s 14.15 s [66]
Carbon nanotube on a polyimide substrate Chemical vapor deposition 50 12 s 56 s [18]
Ru-decorated WS2 quantum dots Two-step synthesis process 500–5000 52 s 138 s [14]
Cyano-terminated ethynylated-thiourea Chemical synthesis 10–1000 1 min 3 min [2]
Al/maPsi/n-Si/Al Laser assisted etching (LAE) - 2.9 min 4.1 min [17]
Graphene oxide Spray pyrolysis on fluorine tin oxide - 125 s 110 s [15]
Nanocrystalline diamond Microwave Plasma CVD process 2500 120 s 400 s [16]
Vanadium Oxide Vacuum thermal evaporation - 50 s 125 s [65]
AArGO Chemical reduction 500 26 s 10 s This work