-
-
Strong motivation of beekeepers
-
-
Collaboration among beekeepers
-
-
Collaboration among different generations of beekeepers
-
-
Advances in genetic selection
|
-
-
Lack of time and labour for facing the adoption of new time-consuming and labour-intensive practices (e.g., new practices to control the varroa mite)
-
-
Lack of financial resources for bearing higher management costs (e.g., supplemental feeding and intensive transhumance)
-
-
Scarce technical endowments (i.e., equipment and machineries)
-
-
Lack of expertise among the younger generations of beekeepers
-
-
Lack of effective marketing strategies in the beekeeping sector
-
-
Lack of beekeeper skills for the sale of hive products
|
-
-
Recent increase of retail prices of honey bee products (FGs took place in 2018, a year characterized by an exceptional increase in the selling prices)
-
-
Public interest in bees as environmental bioindicators (“environmental sentinels”)
-
-
Consumers’ demand for typical honey productions (e.g., mountain blossom honey)
|
-
-
Reduced strength of the honey bee colonies due to climatic, anthropic (pesticides), and biotic stresses
-
-
Significant decline in the production of honey and other bee products (e.g., pollen)
-
-
Increase of varroa infestation and other diseases (e.g., Nosema ceranae)
-
-
Failure in honey bee queen mating
-
-
Insufficient and mistargeted public financial support to the beekeeping sector
-
-
Lower prices of low-quality honey supplied by foreign competitors on the market
-
-
Lack of knowledge transfer and technical advisory services for the beekeeping sector at the regional and national levels
|