Table 2.

Impact of the Smart Girlfriend program on the consistency of condom use at different time points.

Model, group, and time-point		Estimate (SEa)	ORb	95% CrIc
Model 1: Report 0% or 100% condom use consistency in all participants
	Group	0.81 (0.52)	2.25	0.84-6.36
	Time3Md	0.06 (0.33)	1.06	0.56-2.02
	Time6Me	0.17 (0.33)	1.18	0.62-2.25
	Group* Time3Mf	0.00 (0.48)	1.00	0.39-2.58
	Group* Time6Mg	–0.04 (0.49)	0.96	0.37-2.48
Model 2: Report 100% condom use consistency in those reporting 0% or 100%
	Group	2.08 (1.87)	8.03	0.22-330.31
	Time3M	0.85 (0.73)	2.35	0.58-10.55
	Time6M	1.18 (0.74)	3.26	0.80-14.91
	Group* Time3M	–0.66 (1.12)	0.52	0.06-4.57
	Group* Time6M	–2.66 (1.15)	0.07	0.006-0.62
Model 3: Report a condom use consistency between 0% and 100% in all participants
	Group	0.19 (0.22)	1.21	0.78-1.86
	Time3M	–0.00 (0.15)	1.00	0.74-1.34
	Time6M	–0.04 (0.16)	0.96	0.70-1.31
	Group* Time3M	0.07 (0.24)	1.07	0.67-1.71
	Group* Time6M	0.01 (0.25)	1.01	0.63-1.67

^aSE: standard error.

^bOR: odds ratio.

^cCrI: credible interval for a Bayesian-based analysis.

^dTime3M: the 3-month follow-up.

^eTime6M: the 6-month follow-up.

^fGroup*Time3M: the interaction effect between the group and the 3-month follow-up.

^gGroup*Time6M: the interaction effect between the group and the 3-month follow-up.