Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 24;9:e11073. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11073

Table 2. Hazard ratios of renal function decline according to changes of serum uric acid.

Types Quartile1 (<-91.00) (n = 374) Quartile2 (−91.00—36.68) (n = 371) Quartile3 (−36.68–12.34) (n = 373) Quartile4 (≥12.34) (n = 371) P
Renal function reduction Model 1 0.52 (0.39–0.69) 0.62 (0.48–0.80) 0.72 (0.56–0.92) 1.00 <0.001
Model 2 0.53 (0.40–0.69) 0.62 (0.48–0.81) 0.73 (0.56–0.93) 1.00 <0.001
Model 3 0.56 (0.42–0.73) 0.65 (0.50–0.84) 0.74 (0.58–0.95) 1.00 <0.001
Model 4 0.55 (0.42–0.73) 0.66 (0.50–0.85) 0.75 (0.58–0.96) 1.00 0.002
Model 5 0.64 (0.49–0.85) 0.65 (0.50–0.84) 0.75 (0.58–0.96) 1.00 <0.001

Notes.

Data are hazard ratio (95% confidence interval). Participants without renal function reduction are defined as 0 and with renal function reduction as 1. n, cases.

Model 1 is unadjusted.

Model 2 is adjusted for sex and age.

Model 3 is adjusted for sex, age and dietary exercise intervention.

Model 4 is adjusted for sex, age, dietary exercise intervention, Waist-to-Hip Ratio and BMI.

Model 5 is adjusted for sex, age, dietary exercise intervention, Waist-to-Hip Ratio, BMI, pulse pressure variation, 2hPG variation, AST variation, ALT variation, TC variation.

Body mass index (BMI, Kg/m2); 2 hour plasma glucose (2hPG, mmol/L); alanine aminotransferase (ALT, U/L); aspartate aminotransferase (AST, U/L); total cholesterol (TC, mmol/L).