Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 2;57(3):229. doi: 10.3390/medicina57030229

Table 2.

Summary of clinical studies’ characteristics.

Study (Year) Intervention Number of Patients Males/Females Mean Age, Years (SD) Mean Follow-up, Months (SD)
Barth (2020) [2]

  1. Double-row repair

  2. Transosseous-equivalent repair with absorbable patch

  3. SCR with LHBT

 A. 28
B. 30
C. 24		 A. 15/13
B. 19/11
C. 16/8		 A. 63 (9)
B. 59 (7.6)
C. 60 (7)		 A. 15 (2)
B. 27 (5)
C. 25 (2)
Chillemi (2018) [24]  SCR with LHBT 9 4/5 66.4 (3) 6
Kim J. (2020) [25]  SCR with LHBT 61 25/36 64.5 (8.2) 21.2 (range 18–27)
Kocaoglu (2020) [26]

  1. SCR with LHBT

  2. SCR with fascia lata autograft

 A. 14
B. 12		 N/R A. 64.6 (8.4)
B. 62.5 (6.5)		 A. 28
B. 32

N/R: Not reported; SCR: Superior capsular reconstruction; LHBT: Long head of biceps tendon.