Table 5.
F1-score | Recall (Sensitivity) | Precision (PPV) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inception ResNet-v2 | Sheffield Dataset | Patches | 77.9% | 74.1% | 90.2% |
Patient | 87.2% | 99.3% | 81.1% | ||
RoI | 87.0% | 77.8% | 97.6% | ||
Piracicaba Dataset | Patches | 69.8% | 66.9% | 85.8% | |
Patient | 94.2% | 97.9% | 92.5% | ||
RoI | 89.4% | 82.1% | 98.2% | ||
ResNet-101 | Sheffield Dataset | Patches | 71.1% | 72.0% | 79.0% |
Patient | 84.0% | 98.0% | 78.2% | ||
RoI | 80.2% | 73.0% | 87.0% | ||
Piracicaba Dataset | Patches | 85.0% | 67.3% | 89.1% | |
Patient | 94.5% | 98.5% | 94.9% | ||
RoI | 96.3% | 84.8% | 98.4% | ||
Inception-v3 | Sheffield Dataset | Patches | 69.9% | 71.3% | 78.4% |
Patient | 85.1% | 95.8% | 80.8% | ||
RoI | 78.3% | 74.2% | 82.7% | ||
Piracicaba Dataset | Patches | 71.5% | 83.0% | 93.0% | |
Patient | 94.3% | 91.0% | 96.0% | ||
RoI | 91.0% | 92.6% | 97.9% | ||
VGG-16 | Sheffield Dataset | Patches | 71.2% | 72.4% | 80.8% |
Patient | 79.9% | 90.4% | 79.3% | ||
RoI | 76.2% | 70.7% | 81.0% | ||
Piracicaba Dataset | Patches | 83.1% | 78.3% | 95.7% | |
Patient | 97.9% | 100.0% | 95.4% | ||
RoI | 94.6% | 90.2% | 100.0% |