Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 9;10(3):600. doi: 10.3390/cells10030600

Table 2.

Summary of meta-analyses of Bone Marrow Cell Therapy for Ischemic Heart Disease.

Population Cells Studies No. of Patients EF HR (95% CI) Mortality CHF MACE or CHF Hospitalizations Ischemic MACE or MI Other
Myocardial Infarction
Hristov et al. (2006) [79] AMI BMMC 5 482 4.21 (0.21, 8.22)
p = 0.04
Abdel-Latif et al. (2007) [26] IHD BMMC, BMMesC, CPCs 18 807 3.64 (1.56, 5.73)
p < 0.001
No Δ ↓LVEDD, ↓ LVESD, ↓ IS
Lipinski et al. (2007) [82] AMI BMMC 10 698 3.0 (1.9, 4.1)
p < 0.001
OR 0.52 (0.16, 1.63) p = 0.26 OR 0.32
(0.09, 1.21)
p = 0.09
OR 0.22 (0.05, 0.90) p = 0.04 Trend ↓LVEDD, ↓ LVESD, ↓ IS
Martin-Rendon et al. (2008) [83] AMI BMMC 13 811 2.99 (1.26, 4.72)
p = 0.0007
RR 0.62 (0.22, 1.76) p = 0.37 RR 0.61
(0.12, 2.96)
p = 0.54
↓ LVESD, ↓ IS
Jeevanantham et al. (2012) [27] IHD BMMC, BM-MSCs, 50 2625 3.96 (2.90, 5.02)
p < 0.00001
OR 0.39 (0.27, 0.55) p < 0.00001 OR 0.52
(0.27, 1.00)
p = 0.06
OR 0.25 (0.11, 0.57) p = 0.001 36 RCT, 14 cohort studies, ↓LVEDD, ↓ LVESD
Zimmet et al. (2012) [85] AMI BMMCs 23 1317 2.70 (1.48, 3.92)
p < 0.001
OR 0.64 (0.22, 1.72) p = 0.46 OR 0.62
(0.16, 2.20)
p = 0.59
RR = 0.66 (0.16, 2.45) p = 0.67 ↓LVEDD, ↓ LVESD
Delewi et al. (2013) [28] AMI IC BMMC 24 1624 2.23 (1.00, 3.47)
p = 0.004
RR 0.60 (0.34, 1.08) p = 0.09 RR 0.59
(0.35, 0.98)
p = 0.04
RR 0.44 (0.24, 0.79) p = 0.007 No Δ in LVEDD or LVESD
de Jong et al. (2014) [29] AMI BMMC, BM-MSCs 2.10 (0.68, 3.52)
p = 0.004
OR 0.68 (0.36, 1.31) p = 0.25 OR 0.14
(0.03, 0.52)
p = 0.003
OR 0.5 (0.24, 1.06) p = 0.07 ↓ LVESD, ↓ IS
Xu et al. (2014) [84] IHD BMMC, CPCs 19 886 3.54 (1.92, 5.17)
p < 0.001
RR 0.49 (0.28, 0.84) p = 0.01 RR 0.29 (0.06, 1.53) p = 0.14 No Δ LVEDD, ↓ LVESD
Fisher at al. (2016) [76] AMI BMMC, BM-MSC, CD34+ or CD133+ cells 41 2739 0.27 (-1.13, 1.67) p = 0.70 HR 0.92 (0.62, 1.36) p = 0.67 HR 0.36
(0.21, 0.61)
p = 0.002
HR 0.63 (0.40, 1.01) p = 0.05
Gyongyosi et al. (2015) [78] AMI IC BMMC 12 767:485 1.15 (-0.38, 2.69)
p = 0.14
HR 0.81
(0.57, 1.16)
p = 0.25
HR 0.52 (0.28, 1.08) p = 0.08 No Δ in LVEDD or LVESV, patient level analysis
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Kandala et al. (2013) [80] HFrEF (ICM) BMMC 10 519 4.48 (2.43, 6.53)
p < 0.0001
↓LVEDD,
↓ LVESD
Fisher et al. (2015) [77] HFrEF (ICM) BMMC, CPCs, 31 1521 2.06 (1.1, 3.01)
p < 0.0001
RR 0.48 (0.34, 0.69)
p < 0.0001
RR 0.39
(0.22, 0.70)
p = 0.002
Multiple different study types, cells, delivery mechanisms, and additional procedures (PCI/CABG) at time of cell delivery
Refractory Angina
Fisher et al. (2013) [30] CIHD BMMC and CD34+ Cells 9 659 RR 0.33 (0.17, 0.65)
p = 0.001
↓CCS angina class, ↓ AF
Li et al. (2013) [81] CIHD BMMC and CD34+ Cells 5 381 OR 0.33 (0.08, 1.39)
p = 0.13
OR 0.37 (0.14, 0.95) p = 0.04 ↑ETT (61.3 s [18.1, 104.4] p = 0.005; ↓ AF
Henry et al. (2018) [69] CIHD CD34+ Cells 3 304 K-M rate 2.5% (CD34+) vs. 12.1% (placebo)
p = 0.0025
30.0% (CD34+) vs. 38.9% (Placebo)
p = 0.14
↑ETT (49.5 s [9.3, 89.7] p = 0.016;
RR AF 0.66 (p = 0.012)

AF indicates angina frequency; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; BMMC, bone marrow mononuclear cells; BMMesC, bone marrow derived stem cells; BM-MSC, bone marrow mesenchymal cells; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CCS, Canadian Cardiovascular Society; CHF, congestive heart failure; CIHD, chronic ischemic heart disease; CPC, cardiac progenitor cells; EF, ejection fraction; ETT, exercise tolerance test; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; IC, intracoronary; IHD, ischemic heart disease; ICM, ischemic cardiomyopathy; IS, infarct size; K-M, Kaplan-Meier; LVEDD, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end-systolic diameter; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RR, Relative Risk.