Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;10(3):528. doi: 10.3390/plants10030528

Table 3.

Multiple comparison test of LSmean yields (Mg ha−1) comparing foliar-applied micronutrient treatment effects applied at different rates and growth stages with the control using Dunnett’s Test.

Foliar Micronutrient Treatment Locations
2014 2015
Treatments Boron Manganese Zinc Only Fe & Zn Fe Only
Control 14.91(0.20) † 7.90(0.38) 13.70(0.20) 12.70(0.28) 14.22(0.68)
T1R1 ‡ 14.56 8.83 + 13.55 12.57 14.69
T1R2 14.71 7.17 13.49 12.69 16.29 *
T2R1 14.68 9.42 ** 13.21+ 12.54 14.61
T2R2 14.62 7.90 13.41 12.37 15.64
T1R1 and T2R1 15.00 8.66 13.08 ** 11.63 + 16.24 *
T3R1 14.37 + 8.03 13.49 12.69 16.06 +
T3R2 14.68 7.90 13.26 + 12.26 16.14 *
T2R1 and T3R1 14.54 8.72 13.30 - 15.46
T4R1 - - - 13.48 + -
T4R2 - - - 12.71 -
T1R1 and T4R1 - - - 12.86 -
T3R1 and T4R1 - - - 12.47 -

† Least square mean yield (Mg ha−1) followed by (SE for all values in the same column) and by significant F test: Not Significant >0.10; + >0.05; * >0.01; ** >0.001; *** <0.001. ‡ T = Time of foliar application (1: early (V6–11), 2: middle (V15–18), 3: 4: late (R1–4)), R = Treatment rate (rate 1: lower level of industry recommendation & rate 2: upper level of industry recommendation).