Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 5;10(3):574. doi: 10.3390/cells10030574

Table 2.

Results of the main longitudinal studies examining the association between HDL CEC and CV risk.

Longitudinal Studies
Study Study Population Main Findings OD/HR/r and p Value
Rohatgi A. et al., 2014 [58] 2924 subjects free from CVD HDL CEC was inversely associated with the incidence of CV events after adjustment for traditional risk factors. OR: 0.33
Saleheen D. et al., 2015 [59] 1745 initially healthy subjects who later developed fatal or non-fatal CHD; 1749 controls HDL CEC was inversely associated with incidence of CHD events after the adjustment for CV risk factors and HDL-C. OR: 0.64
Patel P.J. et al., 2013 [62] 23 subjects with CAD and EF < 50%; 46 control subjects without CAD and EF > 55% Low HDL CEC was a significant risk factors for HF OR: 2.1
p = 0.03
Khera A.V. et al., 2017 [72] 314 subjects with CVD; 314 controls On-statin HDL CEC was inversely associated with the incidence of CVD 1, although HDL particle number emerged as the strongest predictor 2. 1 OR: 0.62
p = 0.02
2 OR:0.51
p < 0.001
Ritsch A. et al., 2015 [73] 2450 healthy subjects undergoing coronary angiography Inverse correlation between CEC and CV mortality in a fully adjusted model that included traditional CV risk factor. HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 0.64
Chindhy et al., 2018 [74] 2895 subjects without baseline CVD; 210 of them with baseline CKD No significant interaction between CEC and CKD on associations with ASCVD 1 and total CVD 2. 1 HR: 1.30
p = 0.01
2 HR: 1.15
p = 0.05
Javaheri et al., 2016 [75] 35 patients with CAV 1 year after heart transplantation Reduced CEC was independently associated with disease progression and mortality in CAV patients. OR: 0.35
p = 0.048
Kopecki et al., 2017 [76] 1147 patients with T2DM and undergoing hemodialysis No association between CEC and CVD mortality 1, cardiac events 2, and all-cause mortality 3. 1 HR: 0.96
p = 0.42
2 HR: 0.92
p = 0.11
3 HR: 0.96
p = 0.39
Liu et al., 2016 [77] 1737 patients with CAD CEC was an independent factor to predict all-cause 1 and CV mortality 2 in patients with CAD Q4 vs. Q1
1 HR: 0.24
p = 0.001
2 HR: 0.17
p = 0.001
Mody et al., 2016 [78] 1972 patients with/without CAD CEC was inversely associated with ASCVD among subjects with CAC 1, FH 2 and elevated hsCRP 3. 1 HR: 0.40
2 HR: 0.31
3 HR: 0.37
Soria-Florido et al., 2020 [79] 167 patients with ACS; 334 controls CEC was inversely associated with ACS incidence 1 and MI 2. 1 OR: 0.58
2 OR: 0.33
Ebtehaj S. et al., 2019 [71] 351 subjects with CVD developed during follow-up; 354 controls CEC was significantly associated with the future development of CVD events independently of HDL-C and ApoA-I plasma levels OR: 0.73
p < 0.001
Riggs K.A. et al., 2019 [80] 2643 health subjects with < 65 years GlycA was directly associated with HDL-C and ApoA-I, while it was inversely correlated with CEC HR for
Q4 vs. Q1: 3.00
Annema et al., 2016 [82] 495 patients that underwent renal transplantation CEC was not associated with future CV mortality 1 or all-cause mortality 2, while it was found to predict graft failure 3. 1 HR: 1.014
p = 0.92
2 HR: 0.908
p = 0.35
3 HR: 0.428
p = 0.001
Shea S. et al., 2019 [83] 465 cases with incident CV events; 465 controls CEC was significantly associated with lower odds of CVD 1, higher CEC was associated with lower risk of incident CHD 2. 1 OR = 0.82
p = 0.031
2 OR = 0.72
p = 0.007
Garg p.K. et al., 2020 [84] 1458 patients that developed incident clinical or subclinical PAD during 6 years of follow-up High CEC was not significantly associated with incident clinical PAD 1, or subclinical PAD 2 1 HR: 1.25
2 HR: 1.02

ACS: acute coronary syndrome; ASCVD; atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CAC: coronary artery calcium; CAV: cardiac allograft vasculopathy; CEC: cholesterol efflux capacity; CHD: coronary heart disease; CKD: chronic kidney disease; CV: Cardiovascular; CVD: CV disease; HDL-C: high density lipoprotein cholesterol; HF: heart failure; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; MI: myocardial infarction; PAD: peripheral artery disease.