Table 2.
Drug | Trial # | Clinical Phase | Efficacy (%) | Median PFS | Reported Toxicity Any Grade in % (Grade 3–4 in %) |
Data Cutoff |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sotorasib (AMG510) −/+pembrolizumab |
NCT03600883 CodeBreak 100 |
Phase 1/2 recruiting | ORR 37.1 Complete response 2.4 Partial response 34.7 Stable disease 43.5Progressive disease 16.1 Disease control rate 80.6 |
6.8 months | Diarrhea 69.8 (19.8) Nausea 19.0 (0) ALT increase 15.1 (6.3) AST increase 15.1 (5.6) Fatigue 11.1 (0) Vomiting 7.9 (0) Rash 5.6 (0) Treatment discontinuation in 7.1% |
1 December 2020 with a median follow-up time of 12.2 months |
Sotorasib (AMG510) +MEK inhibitor or anti-PD1 |
NCT04185883 CodeBreak 101 |
Phase 1b recruiting | - | - | - | - |
Sotorasib (AMG510) in subjects of Chinese descent |
NCT04380753 CodeBreak 105 |
Phase 1 recruiting | - | - | - | - |
Sotorasib (AMG510) vs. docetaxel |
NCT04303780 CodeBreak 200 |
Phase 3 recruiting | - | - | - | - |
Adagrasib (MRTX849) −/+pembrolizumab −/+afatinib |
NCT03785249 KRYSTAL-1 |
Phase 1/2 recruiting | ORR 45 Complete response 0 Partial response 45 Stable disease 51 Progressive disease 2 Disease control rate 96 |
- | Nausea 54 (2) Diarrhea 51 (2) Vomiting 35 (2) Fatigue 32 (6) Increased ALT 20 (5) Increased AST 17 (5) Increased creatinine 15 (0) Decreased appetite 15 (0) QT prolongation 14 (3) Anemia 13 (2) Grade 5 TRAEs in two patients (pneumonitis, cardiac failure) Discontinuation due to TRAEs in 4.5% |
30 August 2020 with a median follow-up time of 9.6 months |
Adagrasib (MRTX849) +TNO155 |
NCT04330664 KRYSTAL-2 |
Phase 1/2 recruiting | - | - | - | - |
Adagrasib (MRTX849) +pembrolizumab |
NCT04613596 KRYSTAL-7 |
Phase 2 recruiting |
- | - | - | - |
GDC-6036 −/+atezolizumab −/+bevacizumab −/+erlotinib |
NCT04449874 | Phase 1a/1b recruiting | - | - | - | - |
LY3499446 +/− abemaciclib/ erlotinib vs. docetaxel |
NCT04165031 | Phase 1 terminated due to toxicity |
- | - | - | - |