Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;12(3):312. doi: 10.3390/mi12030312

Table 4.

Limits of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) reported for the differential pulse voltammetry method employed in detecting phenolic compounds compared to other methods used.

Electrode Method Phenolic
Compounds
Linear Dynamic
Range(M)
Limit of Detection
(M)
Limit of Quantification (M) Ref.
Ni-GO/GCE SQWV Rutin 1.1 × 10−8 to 1.0 × 10−6 3.2 × 10−9 -- [13]
CTAC/Gr/PdNPs SQWV Rutin 0.02 × 10−6 to 1.0 × 10−6 0.005 × 10−6 -- [11]
GCE/EAuNPs/rGO/Naf CV, LSV, EIS Sinapic 20 × 10−6 to 200 × 10−6 33.43 × 10−9 -- [45]
CPE/Fe3O4 NPs DPV Rutin 0.3 × 10−6 to 3.0 × 10−6 0.8 × 10−7 2.5 × 10−7 This work
CPE/Fe3O4 NPs DPV Sinapic 0.9 × 10−6 to 8.0 × 10−6 2.2 × 10−7 6.7 × 10−7 This work
CPE/Fe3O4 NPs DPV Syringic 1.0 × 10−6 to 9.1 × 10−6 2.6 × 10−7 8.0 × 10−7 This work

CPE = Carbon Paste Electrode, MCPE = Iron oxide nanoparticles modified carbon paste electrode, mol L−1 = moles per liter, GCE/EAuNPs/rGO/Naf = Glassy Carbon Electrode, Electrochemically tuned gold nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) Ref. = References, Ni-GO/GCE = Nickel nanoparticles incorporated with graphene oxide composite-glassy carbon electrode, CTAC = cetyltrimethylammonium chloride, DPV = Differential Pulse Voltammetry, CV = Cyclic Voltammetry, SQWV = Square Wave Voltammetry.