Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;18(6):3104. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063104

Table 5.

The results of fully latent structural regression model (n = 1221).

Relationships Estimate S.E. Est./S.E.
H1: AWC ACR 0.869
(0.833)
0.032 27.344 ***
H2: ACR PSN 0.062
(0.047)
0.022 2.760 **
H3: PSN BHI 0.929
(0.943)
0.020 45.412 ***
H4: ACR ANP −0.006
(−0.005)
0.042 −0.153
H5: ANP PSN 0.913
(0.938)
0.020 46.087 ***
H6: ACR ANG −0.481
(−0.439)
0.033 −14.546 ***
H7: ANG PSN 0.107
(0.089)
0.020 5.459 ***
H8: MAC AWC 0.164
(0.194)
0.028 5.819 ***
H9: MAC BHI 0.072
(0.063)
0.018 3.976 ***
Direct effect: AWC BHI −0.064
(−0.047)
0.021 −2.990 **
Indirect effect: AWC ACR PSN BHI 0.050
(0.037)
0.018 2.754 **

Note 1. * p < 0.05 (This data means that test was done even though there is no result), ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Note 2. Standardized values are in parentheses; Bias-corrected bootstrap sample size = 5000. Note 3. Goodness-of-fit indices: χ2 (141) = 888.142, p < 0.001, RMSEA = 0.066 [0.062, 0.070], CFI = 0.965, TLI = 0.958, SRMR = 0.084. Note 4. MAC = Mass media coverage; AWC = Awareness of consequences; ACR = Ascribed responsibility; PSN = Personal norm; ANP = Anticipated pride; ANG = Anticipated guilt; BHI = Behavioral intention; Note 5. Total variance explained (R2): AWC = 0.038; ACR = 0.694; PSN = 0.887; ANP = 0.000; ANG = 0.193; BHI = 0.893.