Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;11(3):552. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030552

Table 1.

Basic study and patient characteristics.

Authors Year Country Study Design Type Of Patients Evaluated PCa Patients Performing 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Mean/Median Age
(Years)
Gleason Score
(Percentage)
Median PSA Values Before PET/CT (ng/ml)
(Range)
Anttinen et al. [24] 2020 Finland Prospective single-center Patients with high-risk PCa at staging 80 Mean: 70 ± 7 GS 6: 3 (4%)
GS 7: 30 (37%)
GS 8: 13 (16%)
GS 9–10: 34 (43%)
12 (3–2000)
Giesel et al. [25] 2017 Germany Retrospective single-center Patients with high-risk PCa at staging 10 Median: 65 (55–77) GS 7: 3 (30%)
GS 8: 2 (20%)
GS 9: 5 (50%)
14 (5.8–87.3)
Giesel et al. [26] 2018 Germany and South Africa Prospective bicentric Patients with PCa at staging 12 Median: 66 (54–82) GS 6: 1 (8%)
GS 7: 5 (42%)
GS 8: 4 (33%)
GS 9: 2 (17%)
85 (10–279.8)
Hong et al. [27] 2020 China Retrospective single-center Patients with non-metastatic intermediate- or high-risk PCa at staging 101 Median: 69 (43–87) GS 6: 4 (4%)
GS 7: 67 (66%)
GS 8: 9 (9%)
GS 9: 21 (21%)
11.1 (0.97–178.2)
Kesch et al. [28] 2017 Germany Retrospective single-center Patients with high-risk PCa at local staging 10 Median: 67 (55–77) GS 7: 3 (30%)
GS 9: 7 (70%)
13.1 (5.8–40)
Kuten et al. [29] 2020 Israel Prospective single-center Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa at staging 16 Median: 68 (56–74) GS 6: 2 (12%)
GS 7: 11 (69%)
GS 8: 3 (19%)
6.35 (3.5–14.44)
Privé et al. [30] 2020 Netherlands Retrospective single-center Patients with intermediate- or high-risk PCa at staging 53 Median: 67 GS 6: 5 (9%)
GS 7: 19 (36%)
GS 8: 12 (23%)
GS 9–10: 17 (32%)
12
Sprute et al. [31] 2020 Germany, Chile, Japan Retrospective multicenter Patients with PCa at staging 87 Median: 69 (48–78) GS 6: 3%
GS 7: 60%
GS 8: 7%
GS 9: 30%
11.7 (0.1–120)

Legend: CT = computed tomography; GS = Gleason score; PCa = prostate cancer; PET = positron emission tomography; PSA = prostate specific antigen; PSMA = prostate specific membrane antigen.