Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 21;22(6):3201. doi: 10.3390/ijms22063201

Table 1.

Studies assessing the expression of antibodies in otitis media.

Authors and Reference Study Design Species/Type of OM Type of Samples or Specimens Detection Methods Targets Results/Conclusion
Virgil et al. [37] Prospective study Human (255 specimens of MEF from 165 episodes of AOM in children) MEF vs. serum Radial immunodiffusion IgG, IgM, IgA IgA: MEF > serum in almost half the patients
- over 9 months of age: culture(−) was dominant in case of MEF > serum IgA
IgG and IgM: MEF < serum
The MEF of AOM represents primarily a secretory response to inflammation rather than a transudate.
Sloyer et al. [38] Prospective study Human (61 AOM childrenl) MEF, serum IFA, IHA IgG, IgM, IgA (pneumococcal Ab serotype 1, 3, 6, 14, 18, 19, and 23) Serum: IgG, IgM: predominantly detected
MEF: equally detected all three classes
Approximately 25% of the patients (16 of 61) had a positive immune response to their infection as evidenced by increased levels of pneumococcal antibody in the convalescent serum.
Sloyer et al. [39] Prospective study Human (40 AOM children) MEF, serum IFA, IHA IgG, IgM, IgA (Ab to Hi) Serum: IgG> IgM = Ig A: acute phase < convalescent phase
MEF: IgG = IgA > IgM
Sloyer et al. [40] Prospective study Human (103 AOM childrenl) MEF, serum IFA, radial immunodiffusion IgG, IgM, IgA (antibody to measles, mumps, rubella, and polio-1) IgA: MEF > serum
IgG: MEF < serum
Mean specific MEF IgA titer: immunized > unimmunized
Sloyer et al. [33] Prospective study Human (80 patients with AOM) MEF (cleared vs. not cleared) Indirect fluorescent antibody, radioimmunoassay IgG, IgM, IgA (Hi, Spn) Abs concentration: cleared MEF > not cleared MEF
Clearing of the MEF in patients with AOM due to Spn or Hi was significantly associated with the presence and concentration of specific Abs in the MEF at the time of diagnosis.
Ren et al. [41] Prospective study Human: 35 AOM and 149 controls Serum Western blot, ELISA Serum Ab response to Mcat (OMP CD, OppA, Msp22, Hag and PilA2) Serum IgG in all cases: Msp22 = OppA > OMP CD = Hag = PilA2.
Serum antibody to Mcat increased with age in naturally immunized children age 6–30 months following Mcat NP colonization and AOM.
In AOM group:
IgG against OMP CD: acute phase < convalescent phase
High antibody levels against OppA, Msp22, and Hag correlated with reduced carriage.
Kaur et al. [42] Prospective cohort study Human (137 AOM) Serum, MEF, NW ELISA, Western blot IgG, IgA, sIgA IgG: NW < MEF ≈ serum
IgA: NW > MEF ≈ serum
sIgA: MEF (+)
IgA in MEF: originated from serum > NW
Kaur et al. [43] Prospective study (3.5 years) Human: 34 AOM vs. 35 rAOM vs. 25 AOMTF Serum ELISA Serum IgG antibody titers of 5 different Spn proteins (PhtD, LytB, PcpA, PhtE, and Ply) (1) Acute phase:
IgG to PhtD, LytB, PhtE, Ply: rAOM < AOM = AOMTF
(2) Convalescent phase:
IgG to PhtD, LytB, PhtE, Ply: rAOM = AOMTF < AOM
Otitis-prone and AOMTF children mount less of an IgG serum antibody response as compared with non-otitis-prone children to Spn proteins after AOM.
Kaur et al. [44] Prospective study (3.5 years) Human: 26 AOM vs. 32 rAOM vs. 27 AOMTF Serum ELISA Serum Ab response to outer membrane protein D, P6, OMP26 of NTHi (1) Acute phase:
IgG against PD: rAOM < other two groups
IgG against P6, OMP26: rAOM < AOMTF
(2) Convalescent phase:
rAOM and AOMTF: no change in total IgG against all the three proteins
AOM: increased to PD
The data on acute sera of otitis prone vs. non-otitis prone children and the acute-to-convalescence response in non-otitis prone children point to a possible link of anti-PD to protection.
Further, otitis prone children should be evaluated for their responses to PD, P6, and OMP26 vaccine antigens of NTHi.
Veenhoven et al. [34] Prospective study Human (365 AOM children: rAOM vs. non-rAOM) Serum radial immunodiffusion IgG (IgG1, IgG2), IgM, IgA IgG (IgG1, IgG2), IgM, IgA: rAOM < non-rAOM
In rAOM groups (compared with normal value):
IgG, IgM, IgA, IgG1; increased levels
IgG2: decreased levels
Lower Ig levels in rAOM children suggest a generalized decreased Abs response in rAOM children.
Corscadden et al. [45] Cross-sectional study Human (166 rAOM children vs. 61 healthy controls) Serum, MEF multiplex bead-based assay, microsphere-based flow cytometric assay IgG, IgG1, and IgG2
(against 11 pneumococcal polysaccharides: 1, 4,
5, 6B, 7F, 9V, 14, 18C, 19A, 19F, and 23F 1)
IgG and IgG1 against serotype 5: rAOM > control
All pneumococcal serotype specific IgG in rAOM: serum = MEF
Wiertsema et al. [46] Cross-sectional study Human (172 rAOM vs. 63 controls) Serum Multiplex bead assay IgG: against 4 pneumococcal (PspA1, PspA 2, CbpA, and Ply) and 3 NTHi (P4, P6, and PD) IgG against NTHi P4, P6, PD: rAOM > control
IgG against pneumococcal protein antigens: rAOM ≈ control
Krakau et al. [47] Prospective study Human: 28 adults with low IgG2 level during childhood (15: a history of rAOM during childhood vs. 13 controls) Serum Nephelometry, ELISA total IgG and IgG subclasses 1–4 All Igs: rAOM = control
Study subjects who had rAOM combined with low IgG2 levels during childhood had a normalized immunoglobulin pattern as adults.
Freijd et al. [48] Prospective study Human (15 pOME children vs. 15 age matched healthy control children vs. 15 healthy adults) Plasma samples ELISA Spn Abs of different IgG subclasses Adults: IgG1 < IgG2
Children: IgG1 > IgG2 (pOME < control)
Verhaegh et al. [49] Prospective cohort study Human (rAOM vs. cOME) Serum, MEF Luminex xMAP technology IgG, IgM, IgA
(against Spn and Mcat)
Serum and MEF antigen-specific IgG, IgM, IgA: rAOM ≈ cOME
Serum or MEF IgG, IgM, IgA level were not different and not related to bacterial identification in both groups
Serum and MEF show strong correlation for only IgG in both groups
Shin et al. [50] Prospective study Human (29 p-OME vs. 32 OME children) MEF ELISA IgG, IgM, IgA IgA: pOME < OME.
Lower concentrations of IgA in middle ear fluid of patients with OME may be related to OME recurrence and chronicity.
Yamanaka et al. [51] Prospective study Human (320 OME ears: acute, 10.3%; subacute, 16.6%; chronic, 73.1%) MEF ELISA IgG, IgM, IgA IgG-ICs: highest positive rate was found in acute cases
IgA-ICs: highest positive rate was found in subacute cases
neutrophil dominant type in chronic cases: highest IgG-ICs level
ICs formed in the MEF might play an important role in the prolonged inflammatory process of OME through the complement activation following chemotaxis of neutrophils.
Yeo et al. [52] Prospective study Human (58 cOME vs. 64 controls) MEF, serum ELISA, nephelometry IgG, IgM, IgA Serum IgG, Ig M, IgA: cOME < control
MEF Ig concentration–the presence of bacteria: no correlation
MEF Ig concentration–serum Ig concentration: no correlation
Serum Ig concentration: bacteria (+) > bacteria (−)
The presence of effusion bacteria in OME may be related to systemic immunity, but the concentration of Ig in effusion fluid may not be affected by the presence of effusion bacteria.
Drake-Lee et al. [53] Two age-matched cohorts study Human (50 OME vs. 50 age-matched controls) Serum ELISA, radial immunodiffusion Total IgG, IgG subclass, total IgA, IgA subclass Total IgA, IgA2, total IgG, IgG2: OME ≈ control
normal antibody response between both groups of patients.
Chung et al. [54] Prospective study Human (27 mucoid OME vs. 18 serous OME) MEF Immunoblot assay sIgA sIgA: mucoid OME > serous OME
Takada et al. [55] Prospective study Human (59 OME children) MEF, serum ELISA IgG, IgM, IgA, and sIgA antibodies specific to outer membrane antigens of Mcat Serum: IgG > IgA > IgM
MEF: IgG > IgM > sIgA > IgA
All Ig: MEF > serum
IgG and IgM in MEF: acute phase > subacute/chronic phase
sIgA in MEF: acute phase < subacute/chronic phase
IgG in serum or MEF: recurrent/persistent OME group < nonrecurrent/non-persistent OME group
Decreased serum and MEF IgG antibody levels specific to outer membrane antigens of Mcat may lead to failure to eliminate this organism, resulting in persistent and/or recurrent appearance of MEF.
Faden et al. [56] Prospective study Human (14 OME) Serum, MEF Ab assay by 96-well microtiter plate IgG, IgM, IgA Serum: IgG > IgM > IgA
MEF: IgG > IgA > IgM
The IgG- and IgA-specific antibody present in middle ear effusions appeared to represent local production rather than passive diffusion from the systemic circulation.
Lasisi et al. [57] Prospective study Human (20 cSOM vs. 17 aSOM vs. 15 controls) MEF, serum ELISA IgG, IgM Serum IgG: cSOM > control > aSOM
MEF IgG: cSOM > aSOM
Serum IgM: aSOM > cSOM> control
MEF IgM: aSOM > cSOM
Lasisi et al. [58] Prospective study Human: 20cSOM vs. 17 aSOM vs. 15 controls Serum, MEF Radial immunodiffusion IgE Serum IgE: cSOM > aSOM > control
MEF IgE: cSOM > aSOM
MEF/serum IgE ratio: cSOM > aSOM
Serum and MEF showed correlation in cSOM.
Allergy appears to play a contributory role in CSOM and elevated IgE in the MES suggests a likely mucosal response.

OM, otitis media; MEF, middle ear fluid; Ig, immunoglobulin; AOM, acute otitis media; p-OME, prone-otitis media with effusion; OME, otitis media with effusion; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ICs: immune complexes; Hi, Haemophilus influyenzae; Spn, Streptococcus pneumoniae; Abs, antibodies; Mcat, Moraxella catarrhalis; sIgA, secretory IgA; rAOM, recurrent acute otitis media; cOME, chronic otitis media with effusion; cSOM, chronic suppurative otitis media; aSOM, acute suppurative otitis media; IFA, indirect fluorescent antibody test; IHA, indirect hemagglutination; rAOM, recurrent acute otitis media; PspA, Streptococcus pneumoniae antigens pneumococcal surface protein A family; CbpA, choline binding protein A; Ply: pneumolysin; NTHi, nontypeable Haemophilus influenza; P4, Protein 4; P6, Protein6; PD, Protein D; AOMTF, acute otitis media treatment failure; OMP, outer membrane protein; OppA, oligopeptide permease A; Hag, hemagglutinin; Msp, Moraxella surface protein; PilA2, PilA clade 2; Pht, pneumococcal histidine triad proteins; LytB, a murein hydrolases; PcP, a choline binding protein; NW, nasal wash.