Skip to main content
. 2020 May 22;36(2):281–292. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10129-8

Table 3.

Responses to the questionnaire about sEMG biofeedback by healthy (n = 83) and stroke (n = 14) participants

Group What was good about using sEMG? % (n) What was bad about using sEMG? % (n)
Healthy (n = 83) Visual feedback about performance and progress/re-enforcing correct technique 38.6 (32) Nothing 47.00 (39)
Feels odd/unnatural/ “stiffening”/ felt like the restriction of the pad may have changed swallow 8.4 (7)
Could see what I was trying to achieve and aim for/gave me a target/personal best 21.7 (18)
Distracting 6.0 (5)
Interesting/fascinating 18.1 (15) Abrasive skin preparation 3.6 (3)
Made it fun/enjoyable 10.8 (9) Taking off the electrodes 2.4 (2)
Helped me to understand the exercise/swallowing 7.2 (6) Confusing 2.4 (2)
Fatigue 1.2 (1)
Non invasive 4.8 (4) Made me cough 1.2 (1)
Quick and easy to set up 3.6 (3) Used other muscles to complete task 1.2 (1)
Helped motivate/encourage me 3.6 (3) It is quite hard to swallow normally when you know you are being tested 1.2 (1)
Easy to understand 3.6 (3)
Comfortable 3.6 (3) Felt under pressure to meet target 1.2 (1)
Being able to see the muscles working 2.4 (2) Position of the screen above my head, would have been better at eye-level 1.2 (1)
Screen clear/easy to see 2.4 (2)
No comment 6.0 (5) Large equipment, small, portable version would be nicer 1.2 (1)
Coordinating EMG, spoon and swallow together was hard at first 1.2 (1)
No comment 4.8 (4)
Stroke (n = 14) I could see how I was doing which was helpful 35.7 (5) Nothing 78.6 (11)
Made it a challenge/gives you a target 14.3 (2) Didn't like smell of alcohol wipe 7.1 (1)
Helps you know how to practise 7.1 (1) Didn't like electrodes stuck 7.1 (1)
You know what you have to do after the session 7.1 (1) My feedback loop is not strong enough. Not clear what to do to improve things 7.1 (1)
Very happy with the system 7.1 (1)
Motivating 7.1 (1)
Measurement of muscles 7.1 (1)
You (SLT) can see how I am doing 7.1 (1)
No comment 21.4 (3)