Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 27;13:68. doi: 10.1186/s13195-021-00804-9

Table 5.

Combined results from binary logistic regression models and ROC curve analysis for prediction of subsequent development of AD dementia (MCI-AD)

p AIC AUC 95% CI Δ AIC with GFAP
GFAP < 0.0001 148 0.84 0.77–0.91
Age < 0.0001 171 0.73 0.64–0.81
APOE ε4 status < 0.0001 177 0.67 0.58–0.76
GFAP and age < 0.0001 145 0.83 0.76–0.90 −3
GFAP and APOE ε4 status < 0.0001 140 0.86 0.80–0.93 −8
GFAP, age, and APOE ε4 status < 0.0001 136 0.86 0.81–0.92 −12

AIC Akaike information criterion, AUC area under the curve, 95% CI 95% confidence intervals, Δ AIC difference in AIC (AIC of GFAP used as reference)