Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 26;22(4):584–595. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0728

Table 2. Pooled Analysis of the Included Studies Evaluating Efficacy (Random-Effects Model).

Treatment Arm Intracranial ORR Intracranial DCR Intracranial CR
Proportion OR (95% CI) P Proportion OR (95% CI) P Proportion OR (95% CI) P
ICI monotherapy 15 (11–20) REF 26 (21–32) REF 6 (2–14) REF
ICI combined with radiotherapy 42 (31–54) 1.32 (1.17–1.49) < 0.01 85 (63–95) 1.94 (1.72–2.18)* < 0.01 6 (1–37) 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.99
ICI combination therapy 53 (44–61) 1.48 (1.32–1.65) < 0.01 57 (49–66) 1.37 (1.16–1.63)* < 0.01 23 (17–32) 1.26 (1.05–1.50) 0.02
Total 29 (18–43) - - 54 (38–70) - - 10 (5–18) - -

Values are expressed as proportion (95% CI). OR was calculated based on indirect comparison. *Intracranial DCR was significantly higher when using ICI combined with radiotherapy compared to ICI combination therapy (OR [95% CI], 1.41 [1.20–1.67]; p < 0.01). CI = confidence interval, CR = complete response, DCR = disease control rate (proportion of the patients who were confirmed as CR, PR, or SD), OR = odds ratio, ORR = objective response rate (proportion of the patients who were confirmed as CR or PR), PR = partial response, REF = reference category, SD = stable disease