Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Glaucoma. 2021 Apr 1;30(4):e134–e145. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001766

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

A. Derived circumpapillary b-scans from cube scans obtained at two different visits. These are the same as shown in panel 1 of B and C below. The cpRNFL thickness for the two dates are superimposed in the lower panel of A, where the faint gray curve is from time 1. The insets to the right show the portion of the panels within the red rectangle. B. A one-page report using a wide-field, swept-source OCT cube scan as input.30 The probability maps for RNFL (4) and GCIPL (6) are shown in the red rectangles. These maps are based upon the thickness maps in (3) and (5), but are shown in field view (inferior retina/superior visual field on top). The red arrows point to topographically similar locations with thinned RNFL. The black arrows point to locations of the GCIPL which are part of the same defect. B. The report for the same eye obtained 1.2 years later. The regions indicated by the arrows can be seen to have progressed. Reproduced and modified from Fig. 3 in ref. 24 with permission from Ophthalmology. 2017;124(10):1466–1474. Copyright© 2017 ARVO. All rights reserved.