Table 3.
Multivariate analysis of sexual activity and sexual function in men and women survivors
Factors in Final Regression Models: | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P value | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
SEXUALLY INACTIVE IN THE PAST YEAR: | ||||
MALES (n=847) | FEMALES (n=704) | |||
Current Age | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||
18–39 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
40–64 | 1.6 (0.8–3.1) | .21 | 3.9 (1.9–7.7) | .0001 |
≥65 | 4.0 (1.9–8.5) | .0003 | 10.6 (5.1–22.0) | <.0001 |
Education | <.0001 | .006 | ||
4 years college or more | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
<4 years college | 2.2 (1.6–3.2) | 1.6 (1.2–2.3) | ||
Conditioning Regimen | .02 | |||
Myeloablative | 1.0 | NA | ||
Non-Myeloablative | 1.8 (1.1–2.9) | |||
Employment Status | .02 | |||
Employed or school full or part time | 1.0 | NA | ||
Homemaker/retired | 1.8 (1.2–2.7) | .005 | ||
Unemployed/disabled | 1.5 (0.9–2.5) | .08 | ||
Karnofsky Performance Status | <.0001 | .0004 | ||
100% | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
90% | 1.8 (1.1–2.7) | .009 | 1.3 (0.8–1.9) | .25 |
80% or lower | 2.6 (1.7–4.0) | <.0001 | 2.4 (1.6–3.8) | <.0001 |
Relationship Status | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||
In a committed relationship, RDAS high quality | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
In a committed relationship, RDAS low quality | 1.9 (1.2–2.9) | .006 | 1.6 (1.0–2.6) | .06 |
Not in a committed relationship | 3.6 (2.2–5.8) | <.0001 | 7.0 (4.6–10.7) | <.0001 |
LOW SEXUAL FUNCTIONING: | ||||
MALES (n=621) | FEMALES (n=465) | |||
Current Age | <.0001 | |||
18–39 | 1.0 | NA | ||
40–64 | 3.1 (1.4–7.2) | .007 | ||
≥65 | 7.2 (3.1–17.1) | <.001 | ||
Karnofsky Performance Status | <.0001 | .002 | ||
100% | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
90% | 2.8 (1.9–4.3) | <0.001 | 1.9 (1.2–3.0) | .004 |
80% or lower | 4.0 (2.5–6.4) | <0.001 | 2.3 (1.3–4.0) | .004 |
Relationship Status | .02 | |||
In a committed relationship, RDAS high quality | NA | 1.0 | ||
In a committed relationship, RDAS low quality | 2.3 (1.2–4.4) | .001 | ||
Not in a committed relationship | 0.8 (0.5–1.4) | .41 |
RDAS, Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale