TABLE 6.
“Congruency effect” results.
| BDC | POST | FU | Ptime (η2) | Pgroup (η2) | Ptime × group (η2) | |
| <0.001 (0.331) | 0.080 | <0.001 (0.292) | ||||
| EG2 | 93.764.3 | 90.562.8 | 110.261.1# | |||
| EG1 | 63.342.7 | 57.147 | 74.847.1# | |||
| CG2 | 84.944.5 | 127.944.6# | 129.442.8 | |||
| CG1 | 85.249.3 | 109.960# | 105.356.9 | |||
| p-value (groups) | 0.440 | 0.009* | 0.065 | |||
EG2 – group with 2 exergame and 2 regular tennis trainings/week; EG1 – group with 1 exergame and 1 regular tennis trainings/week; CG2 – group 2 regular tennis trainings/week; CG1 – group with 1 regular tennis training/week; BDC – baseline; POST – post intervention; FU – Follow-up after 1 year. *p < 0.05. #Significantly different from previous measurement at p < 0.05.