Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 15;12:611382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.611382

TABLE 6.

“Congruency effect” results.

BDC POST FU Ptime (η2) Pgroup (η2) Ptime × group (η2)
<0.001 (0.331) 0.080 <0.001 (0.292)
EG2 93.764.3 90.562.8 110.261.1#
EG1 63.342.7 57.147 74.847.1#
CG2 84.944.5 127.944.6# 129.442.8
CG1 85.249.3 109.960# 105.356.9
p-value (groups) 0.440 0.009* 0.065

EG2 – group with 2 exergame and 2 regular tennis trainings/week; EG1 – group with 1 exergame and 1 regular tennis trainings/week; CG2 – group 2 regular tennis trainings/week; CG1 – group with 1 regular tennis training/week; BDC – baseline; POST – post intervention; FU – Follow-up after 1 year. *p < 0.05. #Significantly different from previous measurement at p < 0.05.