Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 13;6(1):25–32. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000370

Table 2.

Comparison of plaque prevalence and features between Caucasians and Chinese

Extracranial carotid artery Intracranial artery
Caucasians (n=26) Chinese (n=55) P value Caucasians (n=26) Chinese (n=55) P value
Plaque 19 (73.1) 27 (49.1) 0.055 10 (38.5) 38 (69.1) 0.02
Presence of luminal stenosis 15 (57.7) 20 (36.4) 0.09 11 (42.3) 40 (72.7) 0.01
Number of plaques per subject* 1.7±0.7 1.7±0.9 0.85
Plaque features
 LRNC 16 (61.5) 23 (41.8) 0.15 2 (7.7) 17 (30.9) 0.03
 IPH 6 (23.1) 10 (18.2) 0.77 1 (3.9) 2 (3.6) >0.99
 Calcification 7 (26.9) 6 (10.9) 0.10 0 8 (14.6) 0.050
 Luminal surface disruption 9 (34.6) 2 (3.6) <0.001 0 4 (7.3) 0.30
 HRP 11 (42.3) 9 (16.4) 0.03 1 (3.9) 6 (10.9) 0.42

Values are number (percentage) or mean±SD.

Bold indicates P-values<0.05.

*Number of plaques was only assessed in intracranial artery.

HRP, high-risk plaque; IPH, intra-plaque haemorrhage; LRNC, lipid-rich necrotic core.