Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 12;12:630429. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.630429

Table 1.

Study characteristics.

Study Design N Age in TKI group (range) TKI Comparator Myeloablative conditioning CR at transplantb High-risk cytogenetics Length of follow-up
Burchert et al. (31) Randomized phase 2 83 54
(23–74)
Sorafenib Placebo TKI: 42%,
Placebo: 47%
TKI: 63%,
placebo: 48%
TKI: 2%,
Placebo: 8%
42 months
Brunner et al. (30) Retrospective 81 55
(20–74)
Sorafenib No TKI TKI: 54%,
No: 49%
100% (CR1) 8% 27 months
Schlenk et al. (29) Prospective
phase 2, propensity score matching with historical controls
116a 54
(18–70)
Midostaurin Historical control NR TKI: 61%, control: 43% NR 24 months
Xuan et al. (28) Randomized
phase 3
202 35
(26–42)
Sorafenib No TKI 100% TKI: 73%,
no: 77%
TKI: 7%,no: 5% 21 months
Xuan et al. (27) Retrospective 82 37
(15–55)
Sorafenib No TKI 100% 77% TKI: 6%,
no: 1%
59 months
Maziarz et al. (32) Randomized
phase 2
60 18–70c Midostaurin No TKI 100% NR NR 18 months
Shi et al. (33) Retrospective 56 24
(14–62)
Sorafenib No TKI 100% 100% 17% 24 months

N, number; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; HSCT, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; RIC, reduced intensity conditioning; CR, complete remission; NR, not reported.

a

The original number of patients in the study was 284, here we report on the subgroup analyses of patients that actually underwent midostaurin maintenance after stem-cell transplantation or not.

b

As reported in the patient characteristics of the trials.

c

Inclusion criteria, age distribution not given.