Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 2;8(2):928–937. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13198

Table 1.

Anatomo‐pathological, echocardiographic data

Characteristic Ctrl (n = 9) Ctrl + Meto (n = 6) Dox + Trast (n = 11) Dox + Trast + Meto (n = 8)
Anatomical parameters
Body weight (g) 27 ± 0.8 27 ± 1.0 24 ± 0.5*** 19 ± 0.9 $$$
Heart weight (mg) 119 ± 3.9 126 ± 5.5 105 ± 2.7* 86 ± 4.2 $$$
Heart weight/Tibia length (mg/mm) 5.8 ± 0.2 6.5 ± 0.3 5.3 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.2 $$$
Heart weight/Body weight 4.2 ± 0.07 4.6 ± 0.08 4.5 ± 0.09 4.5 ± 0.11
End diastolic left ventricular diameter (mm) 3.3 ± 0.06 3.6 ± 0.06 3.4 ± 0.08 3.5 ± 0.09
Echocardiographic data
LV mass (mg/mm2) 80 ± 5.8 100 ± 3.0 68 ± 3.9** 76 ± 4.3 $$
Shortening fraction (%) 55 ± 0.9 50 ± 1.8 40 ± 1.3*** 41 ± 2.0 $
LVEF (%) 87 ± 0.8 81 ± 2.1 74 ± 2.7*** 71 ± 2.7 $
Heart rate (beats per min) 614 ± 15 571 ± 37 598 ± 15 322 ± 29 $$$
Intracardiac AMPc (pmol/mg proteins) 7.7 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.3 56 ± 5.3*** 20 ± 0.5 $$

LV, Left ventricle; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction.

*

Ctrl vs. Dox + Trast P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01,

***

P < 0.001 using two‐way ANOVA test followed by Bonferroni post hoc test.

$

Ctrl + Meto vs. Dox + Trast + Meto P < 0.05,

$$

P < 0.01,

$$$

P < 0.001 using two‐way ANOVA test followed by Bonferroni post hoc test.