Table 4.
Mobility aid use | ORs (95% CI) for mobility aid use within strata of sidewalk problemsb | Measure of interaction on additive scale: RERI (95% CI)c | Measure of interaction on multiplicative scale: Ratio of ORs (95% CI) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Never | Ever | |||||||
N Y=1/Y=0a |
OR (95% CI) | N Y=1/Y=0a |
OR (95% CI) | |||||
Severity of Sidewalk Problems | Not really a problem | 595/4355 | 1.00 | 182/521 | 1.34 (1.09, 1.65); P<0.01 | 1.29 (1.04, 1.61); P=0.02 | ||
Minor problem | 285/1770 | 1.17 (1.00, 1.37); P=0.05 | 78/230 | 1.45 (1.09, 1.94); P=0.01 | 1.25 (0.91, 1.73); P=0.17 | −0.06 (−0.55, 0.43); P=0.59 | 0.93 (0.65, 1.32); P=0.67 | |
Somewhat serious problem | 150/666 | 1.50 (1.22, 1.84); P<0.01 | 40/103 | 1.47 (0.99, 2.19); P=0.06 | 0.95 (0.60, 1.52); P=0.84 | −0.36 (−1.04, 0.31); P=0.85 | 0.73 (0.46, 1.17); P=0.19 | |
Very serious problem | 173/573 | 1.80 (1.48, 2.20); P<0.01 | 40/102 | 1.50 (1.01, 2.23); P=0.05 | 0.94 (0.60, 1.48); P=0.79 | −0.65 (−1.36, 0.07); P=0.96 | 0.62 (0.39, 0.99); P=0.04 | |
ORs (95% CI) for minor sidewalk problems within strata of mobility aid usee | 1.17 (1.00, 1.37); P=0.05 | 1.03 (0.75, 1.42); P=0.84 | ||||||
ORs (95% CI) for somewhat serious sidewalk problems within strata of mobility aid usee | 1.48 (1.21, 1.82); P<0.01 | 1.10 (0.73, 1.66); P=0.66 | ||||||
ORs (95% CI) for very serious sidewalk problems within strata of mobility aid usee | 1.77 (1.45, 2.16); P<0.01 | 1.15 (0.76, 1.74); P=0.52 |
Note: OR = Odds Ratio; CI = Confidence Interval; RERI = Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction; All odds ratios presented in this table are adjusted for age, race, gender, individual income, individual education, mobility aid use (Model 7); Table presentation is following the recommendations from Knol and VanderWeele (2012).
Y=1 represents the number of participants reporting going into the neighborhood less than one time per week, Y=0 represents the number of participants reporting going into the neighborhood one to seven times per week
Odds ratios obtained from separate, stratified models among participants reporting severity of sidewalk problems as: not really a problem (N= 5,653), minor problem (N=2,363), somewhat serious problem (N=959), very serious problem (N=888). Adjusted odds ratios of the relationship between mobility aid use and going into the neighborhood less than one time per week compared to one to seven times per week reported above.
Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction (RERI) represents the differences in differences in odds ratios. RERI can be more precisely written as: OR11-(OR10+OR01-1), OR12-(OR10+OR02-1), OR13-(OR10+OR03-1) for minor, somewhat serious, and very serious sidewalk problems, respectively. Where mobility aid use = i (0 = never using mobility aid, 1 = ever using mobility aid) and sidewalk problems = j (0 = Not really a problem, 1 = Minor problem, 2 = Somewhat serious problem, 3 = Very serious problem) for all ORij.
Ratio of Odds Ratios can be written as: OR11/(OR10×OR01), OR12/(OR10×OR02), OR13/(OR10×OR03) for minor, somewhat serious, and very serious sidewalk problems, respectively. Where mobility aid use = i (0 = never using mobility aid, 1 = ever using mobility aid) and sidewalk problems = j (0 = Not really a problem, 1 = Minor problem, 2 = Somewhat serious problem, 3 = Very serious problem) for all ORij.
Odds ratio obtained from separate, stratified models among participants reporting mobility aid use: never (N= 8,567), ever (N= 1,296). Adjusted odds ratios of the relationship between severity of sidewalk problems and going into the neighborhood less than one time per week compared to one to seven times per week reported above.