Table 2. Vegetation area, percentage and classification accuracy of WLFZs in each study area.
| Study area | Category | Area(㎡) | Percentage | Accuracy | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| user | producer | OA | KIA | ||||||
| Huangdeng1 | Non-Veg | 7849.83 | 99.95% | 98.8% | 95.5% | 95.8% | 0.905 | ||
| Veg | 3.61 | 0.05% | 93.1% | 93.1% | |||||
| Huangdeng2 | Non-Veg | 1454.81 | 98.92% | 98.1% | 96.5% | 97.0% | 0.950 | ||
| Veg | 15.91 | 1.08% | 97.3% | 100% | |||||
| Nuozhadu | Non-Veg | 3067.43 | 37.56% | 93.9% | 98.8% | 94.1% | 0.912 | ||
| Veg | X. Sib, A. Con | 3825.46 | 75.03% | 62.44% | 94% | 99.5% | |||
| C. Dac | 735.57 | 14.43% | 96.9% | 81% | |||||
| E. Ind | 343.42 | 6.74% | 95.6% | 91.2% | |||||
| Other-Veg | 194.4 | 3.81% | 90.7% | 92.6% | |||||
| Xiaowan | Non-Veg | 9895.38 | 54.5% | 99.1% | 100% | 98.7% | 0.981 | ||
| Veg | P. Ple | 4870.90 | 58.96% | 45.50% | 97.8% | 99.4% | |||
| C. Dac | 2797.60 | 33.86% | 98.6% | 96.1% | |||||
| Other-Veg | 593.35 | 7.18% | 99.3% | 93.6% | |||||
Note: X. Sib (X. Sibiricum), A.Con (A. Conyzoides), C.Dac (C. Dactylon), E.Ind (E. Indica), P. Ple (P. Plebeium), C.Dac (C. Dactylon), Veg (Vegetation), Other-Veg (Other-Vegetation), Non-Veg (Non-Vegetation), OA (Overall Accuracy), KIA (kappa coefficient).