Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 29;11:192. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01317-7

Table 2.

Comparisons of the component of the common neurobiological substrate (CCS) and the CCS genetic architecture with psychiatric disorders.

LD score regression (LDSC)
GWAS comparison rg p value
 Psychiatric cross-disorder 0.0005 0.99
 Bipolar disorder 0.17 0.08
 Major depression −0.03 0.75
 Schizophrenia 0.08 0.38
Rank–rank hypergeometric overlap (RRHO)
GWAS comparison Overlap p value
 Psychiatric cross-disorder 0.29 0.53
 Bipolar disorder 0.21 0.06
 Major depression 0.04 0.18
 Schizophrenia 0.02 0.15
Binomial sign tests (p<0.05)
GWAS comparison Probability p value
 Psychiatric cross-disorder 0.50 0.77
 Bipolar disorder 0.50 0.67
 Major depression 0.50 0.82
 Schizophrenia 0.50 0.64
Binomial sign tests (p<1×10−5)
GWAS comparison Probability p value
 Psychiatric cross-disorder 0.33 0.93
 Bipolar disorder 0.54 0.50
 Major depression 0.33 0.93
 Schizophrenia 0.54 0.50
Polygenic scores (PGS)
Training GWAS Effect size p value pT
 Psychiatric cross-disorder −0.78 0.30 5 × 10−8
 Bipolar disorder −0.64 0.05 1 × 10−7
 Major depression −5.01 0.31 1 × 10−2
 Schizophrenia −0.58 0.24 1 × 10−7

Details on the four training genome-wide association studies (GWAS) datasets are provided in the Methods section. LDSC: linkage disequilibrium score regression using genome-wide summary statistics (Supplementary Table S10); rg genetic correlation. RRHO: rank–rank hypergeometric overlap test showing the relative overlap of genome-wide summary statistics (Supplementary Table S11). Sign tests one-sided binomial sign tests for CCS GWAS p value thresholds p < 0.05 and p < 1 × 10−5 and the corresponding probability of success (Supplementary Table S12). PGS association of polygenic scores with the CCS; pT training GWAS data p value threshold; effect size linear regression effect size at the pT showing the strongest support for an association (see Supplementary Table S13 for results of all ten thresholds); p value: one-sided p value not corrected for multiple testing. The significance level adjusted for multiple testing was α = 0.05/(10 × 4) = 0.00125.