TABLE 3.
Quantitative studies critical appraisal checklist.
Criteria | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
1. Aims and objectives clearly stated | 4 | 0 |
2. Hypothesis or research question clearly specified | 2 | 0 |
3. Dependent and independent variables clearly stated | 3 | 1 |
4. Variables adequately operationalised | 4 | 0 |
5. Design adequately described | 4 | 0 |
6. Method appropriate | 4 | 0 |
7. Instrument used tested for reliability and validity | 3 | 1 |
8. Sample, inclusion or exclusion and response rate described | 4 | 0 |
9. Statistical errors discussed | 4 | 0 |
10. Ethical consideration | 3 | 1 |
11. Was the study piloted? | 3 | 1 |
12. Statistical analysis appropriate | 4 | 0 |
13. Results reported and clear | 4 | 0 |
14. Results reported related to hypothesis and literature | 4 | 0 |
15. Limitations reported | 3 | 1 |
16. Conclusions do not go beyond limit of data and results | 4 | 0 |
17. Findings able to be generalised | 1 | 3 |
18. Implications discussed | 4 | 0 |
19. Conflict of interest with sponsor | 1 | 3 |
20. Data available for scrutiny and re-analysis | 1 | 3 |
Source: Bowling, A., 2009, Research methods in health: Investigating health and health services, Open University Press, Maidenhead.