Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 9;11:641450. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641450

Table 1.

Treatment options for fertility preservation.

Technique Definition Advantages Disadvantages Experimental
Oocyte cryopreservation Controlled ovarian stimulation, followed by oocyte retrieval and cryoconservation for future use - well-established fertility preservation technique
- no ethical issues
- time required for ovarian stimulation
- risk of overstimulation
- invasive procedure for oocyte retrieval (day surgery)
- not recommended in women with hormone-sensitive cancers
- not possible for prepubertal girls
- need of a male partner/donor for oocyte fertilization prior to implantation
- high cost
No
Embryo cryopreservation Controlled ovarian stimulation, followed by oocyte retrieval, in vitro fertilization and embryo cryopreservation for future use (19, 20). - well-established fertility preservation technique
- good embryo survival to thawing
- direct transfer into the uterus after thawing
- ethical issues regarding embryo disposition
- time required for ovarian stimulation and subsequent delay in timely cancer treatment
- risk of overstimulation
- invasive procedure for oocyte retrieval (day surgery)
- not recommended in women with hormone-sensitive cancers
- not possible for prepubertal girls
- need of a male partner/donor
- high cost
No*
Ovarian Tissue cryopreservation Surgical retrieval of ovarian tissue, cryopreservation of the tissue and subsequent reimplantation once patient is disease-free - feasible for prepubertal children
- does not require hormonal stimulation
- can be planned shortly after diagnosis of malignant disease
- surgical procedure under general anesthesia
- risk of the re-introduction of carcinogenic cells
- risk of malignant transformation of the ovarian tissue
- risk of ischemic damage to the tissue
- limited availability of centers with adequate cryoconservation competences and able to perform the most sensitive and updated histological analysis techniques before transplantation to avoid relapses
- high cost
Yes
Ovarian suppression with GnRHa Concomitant use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (triptorelin, goserelin, leuprolide) during the course of chemotherapy to induce a prepubertal hormonal milieu and preserve the ovarian function - not invasive
- does not need delaying in oncologic therapy
- can be used in association with cryopreservation techniques
- reduce the risk of hypermenorrhea associated with hematologic malignancies or myelosuppressive treatments
- low cost
- symptoms of estrogenic deprivation
- transient alterations of bone metabolism not significant for therapy duration < 6 months
- limited clinical evidences in patients with disease other than breast cancer
Yes**

*Forbidden in Italy (Law 40/2003); **Reimbursed in Italy for oncologic adult patients according to Law 648/96.