Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 12;33(2):42–54. doi: 10.1177/1569186120968035

Table 3.

Predictors of general academic integrity of UG (n = 609) and GEM (n = 92) occupational therapy students based on bootstrapped linear regression analysis.


Before bootstrapping

After bootstrappinga
Bb SE B β t p PC PC2 SE B p BCa 95 % CI Lower BCa 95 % CI Upper
Predictors for UG students
  (Constant) 28.26 3.822 7.395 .001 4.720 .001 18.092 38.855
 Age .705 .248 .113 2.840 .005c .115 .0132 .322 .028c .152 1.330
 Gender –2.247 .540 –.163 –4.161 .001c –.168 .0282 .607 .001c –3.437 –1.070
 Grade point average –.600 .260 –.093 –2.306 .021c –.094 .0088 .250 .015c –1.089 –.099
 MDSP Factor 1 Authoritative standards –.007 .134 –.002 –.049 .961 –.002 na .133 .960 –.259 .247
 MDSP Factor 2 Public meaning –.425 .187 –.095 –2.271 .024c –.093 .0086 .196 .028c –.796 –.068
 MDSP Factor 3 Moral practice .299 .108 .114 2.761 .006c .112 .0125 .105 .003c .096 .490
 ADTC Scale 1: Tendency towards cheating –1.457 .516 –.122 –2.826 .005c –.115 .0132 .505 .005c –2.521 –.405
 ADTC Scale 3: Tendency towards dishonesty in the process of doing and reporting research –1.135 .411 –.120 –2.762 .006c –.112 .0125 .474 .016c –2.042 –.187
 ADTC Scale 4: Tendency towards dishonesty in providing appropriate references and acknowledgements 1.504 .441 .140 3.412 .001c .138 .0019 . 544 . 006c .505 2.473
 PASS Factor 1: Pressures to perform –.073 .082 –.036 –.899 .369 –.037 na .083 .395 –.238 .090
 PASS Factor 3: Self-perceptions –.090 .109 –.035 –.833 .405 –.034 na .104 .378 –.292 .102
Predictors for GEM students
  (Constant) 29.40 10.87 2.704 .008 9.633 .003 10.652 49.516
 Gender –3.99 1.607 –.236 –2.479 .015c –.261 .0681 1.883 .036c –7.736 –.621
 No. of hours of direct time spent attending occupational therapy education programme each week –.059 .092 –.062 –.642 .522 –.070 na .074 .408 –.209 .110
 No. of hours per week spent in paid employment while attending your occupational therapy education programme .122 .080 .151 1.520 .132 .164 na .089 .185 –.059 .302
 MDSP Factor 1 Authoritative standards .480 .352 .131 1.363 .176 .147 na .371 .201 –.246 1.438
 ADTC Scale 1: Tendency towards cheating –1.746 1.686 –.100 –1.035 .303 –.112 na 1.319 .173 –4.171 .895
 ADTC Scale 4: Tendency towards dishonesty in providing appropriate references and acknowledgements –4.656 1.637 –.269 –2.844 .006c –.296 .0876 2.009 .017c –8.731 –2.097
 PASS Factor 2: perceptions of workload and examinations .487 .285 .171 1.707 .091 .183 na .261 .062 .013 .929

aUnless otherwise noted, bootstrap results are based on 1000 bootstrap samples.

bB remained unchanged after bootstrapping.

cStatistically significant p-values (p < 0.05).

GEM: graduate-entry masters; Constant: y-intercepts of regression line; B: unstandardised beta coefficient; SE B: standard error for the unstandardised beta; β: standardised beta; t: the t test statistic; CI: confidence interval; PC: Part Correlation; PC2: Part Correlation Squared; BCa: bias-corrected and accelerated; MDSP: Moral Development Scale for Professionals; ADTC: Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale; PASS: Perceived Academic Sources of Stress; na: not applicable.