Table 3. Summary of Catalytic Results in NaIO4-Driven WOa.
entry | [Ir] (μM) | [NaIO4] (mM) | TON | TOF (min–1) | yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||
1 | 1 | 20 | 9470 ± 947 | 237 ± 24 | 95 |
2 | 2.5 | 20 | 4000 ± 400 | 220 ± 22 | 100 |
3 | 5 | 5 | 460 ± 46 | 84 ± 8 | 92 |
4 | 5 | 10 | 1000 ± 100 | 121 ± 12 | 100 |
5 | 5 | 20 | 1969 ± 197 | 211 ± 21 | 99 |
6 | 5 | 40 | 4000 ± 400 | 269 ± 27 | 100 |
7 | 10 | 20 | 953 ± 95 | 153 ± 15 | 95 |
2 | |||||
8 | 1 | 20 | 9690 ± 969 | 256 ± 27 | 97 |
9 | 2.5 | 20 | 3700 ± 370 | 207 ± 21 | 93 |
10 | 5 | 5 | 493 ± 49 | 75 ± 7 | 99 |
11 | 5 | 10 | 1000 ± 100 | 122 ± 12 | 100 |
12 | 5 | 20 | 1956 ± 196 | 163 ± 16 | 98 |
13 | 5 | 40 | 3604 ± 360 | 246 ± 25 | 90 |
14 | 10 | 20 | 974 ± 97 | 140 ± 14 | 97 |
3 | |||||
15 | 1 | 20 | 8730 ± 873 | 313 ± 31 | 87 |
16 | 2.5 | 20 | 3796 ± 380 | 256 ± 26 | 95 |
17 | 5 | 5 | 464 ± 46 | 139 ± 14 | 93 |
18 | 5 | 10 | 984 ± 98 | 189 ± 19 | 98 |
19 | 5 | 20 | 1960 ± 196 | 196 ± 20 | 98 |
20 | 5 | 40 | 3924 ± 392 | 402 ± 40 | 98 |
21 | 10 | 20 | 969 ± 97 | 205 ± 20 | 97 |
4 | |||||
22 | 1 | 20 | 9499 ± 950 | 142 ± 14 | 95 |
23 | 2.5 | 20 | 3927 ± 398 | 102 ± 10 | 98 |
24 | 5 | 5 | 500 ± 50 | 37 ± 4 | 100 |
25 | 5 | 10 | 1000 ± 100 | 53 ± 5 | 100 |
26 | 5 | 20 | 1985 ± 198 | 62 ± 6 | 99 |
27 | 5 | 40 | 3907 ± 391 | 98 ± 10 | 98 |
28 | 10 | 20 | 994 ± 99 | 73 ± 7 | 99 |
Experimental conditions: 25 °C, 5 mL H2O, pH 7 by phosphate buffer.
Estimated with respect to utilized NaIO4. A 10% uncertainty on both TOF and TON assumed based on duplicate experiments [for instance, at [Ir] = 5 μM and [NaIO4] = 20 mM, TON = 1963–1975 (1), 1944–1968 (2), 1920–2000 (3), 1970–2000 (4) and TOF = 207–215 (1), 161–164 (2), 193–199 (3), 57–67 (4) min–1] and in line with previous measurements.7,21