Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 29;22:313. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04179-8

Table 2.

Comparisons the average score of pain and physical function among the three groups in different time points (n = 128)

Primary outcomes BL 3rd MFU 6th MFU Between groups (QSE vs. BDJ vs. CE) Time × Group
BL 3rd MFU 6th MFU
(Mean ± SD) (Mean ± SD) (Mean ± SD) F P-value F P-value F P-value F P-value†
WOMAC-pain 0.045 0.956 2.875 0.060 9.071 < 0.001 28.888 < 0.001
 QSE(n = 43) 6.91 ± 2.42 5.47 ± 2.20 5.53 ± 2.49
 BDJ(n = 41) 6.76 ± 2.42 5.71 ± 2.10 5.46 ± 2.25
 CE(n = 44) 6.86 ± 2.24 4.66 ± 2.08 3.68 ± 2.13
WOMAC-physical function −0.061 0.941 2.746 0.068 5.440 0.005 26.646 < 0.001
 QSE(n = 43) 18.91 ± 5.35 16.74 ± 5.07 16.88 ± 6.49
 BDJ(n = 41) 18.76 ± 5.06 16.32 ± 5.05 16.00 ± 6.45
 CE(n = 44) 19.14 ± 4.77 14.41 ± 4.72 12.59 ± 6.27

The repeated measures ANOVA was used to test the time by group interaction effects across the 3 time points of the study

WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, pain (0–20), physical function (0–68), QSE Quadriceps strengthening exercise, BDJ Baduanjin qigong, CE The combined exercise of quadriceps strengthening exercise and Baduanjin qigong, BL Baseline, MFU Month of follow-up, SD Standard deviation; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant