Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 29;22:313. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04179-8

Table 3.

SIDAK multiple pairwise comparisons of average score of pain and physical function for the three groups at different time points of the study

Primary outcomes BL vs. 3rd MFU BL vs. 6th MFU 3rd MFU vs. 6th MFU
Mean difference (95% CI) P-value Mean difference (95% CI) P-value Mean difference (95% CI) P-value
WOMAC-pain
 QSE(n = 43) 1.442(from 1.129 to 1.754) < 0.001 1.372(from 0.988 to 1.756) < 0.001 − 0.070(from − 0.412 to 0.272) 0.946
 BDJ(n = 41) 1.049(from 0.729 to 1.369) < 0.001 1.293(from 0.900 to 1.686) < 0.001 0.244(from −0.106 to 0.594) 0.257
 CE(n = 44) 2.205(from 1.896 to 2.514) < 0.001 3.182(from 2.803 to 3.561) < 0.001 0.977(from 0.639 to 1.315) < 0.001
WOMAC-physical function
 QSE(n = 43) 2.163(from 1.624 to 2.702) < 0.001 2.023(from 1.065 to 2.982) < 0.001 −0.140(from −1.025 to 0.746) 0.974
 BDJ(n = 41) 2.439(from 1.887 to 2.991) < 0.001 2.756(from 1.907 to 3.605) < 0.001 0.317(from −0.394 to 1.028) 0.373
 CE(n = 44) 4.727(from 4.194 to 5.260) < 0.001 6.545(from 5.598 to 7.493) < 0.001 1.818(from 0.943 to 2.694) < 0.001

WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index, pain (0–20), physical function (0–68), QSE Quadriceps strengthening exercise, BDJ Baduanjin qigong, CE The combined exercise of quadriceps strengthening exercise and Baduanjin qigong, BL Baseline, MFU Month of follow-up, SD Standard deviation, CI Confidence interval; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant after adjustment