Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan;8(1):48–57. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30383-7

Table 3.

Mean change in depressive symptom severity score per 1-point increase in loneliness score, using repeated measures of depressive symptoms from waves three to eight

Change in depressive symptom severity score (95% CI) p value
Model one: univariable association 0·38 (0·35–0·41) <0·0001
Model two: model one plus continuous linear time variable 0·38 (0·35–0·41) <0·0001
Model three: model two plus continuous quadratic time variable* 0·38 (0·35–0·41) <0·0001
Model four: model two adjusted for social experiences related to loneliness 0·36 (0·33–0·40) <0·0001
Model five: model four adjusted for polygenic risk scores 0·36 (0·32–0·39) <0·0001
Model six: model five adjusted for sociodemographic factors§ 0·33 (0·29–0·36) <0·0001
Model seven: model six adjusted for health indicators 0·29 (0·26–0·32) <0·0001
Model eight: model seven adjusted for depressive symptoms at baseline 0·16 (0·13–0·19) <0·0001
*

Time squared was subsequently excluded from models because of no evidence of departure from linearity.

Social network size, social contact frequency, participation in social groups, and perceived social support.

Polygenic risk scores for depressive symptoms and loneliness.

§

Age, sex, ethnicity, marital status, level of education, employment status, and wealth.

Long-term physical illness, mobility impairment, pain, body-mass index, waist circumference, and cognitive function.

Interactions between loneliness and time and loneliness and time squared were added to model eight; results for interaction terms are reported in the text.