Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;43(9):405–413. doi: 10.1159/000508312

Table 2.

QoL scores at baseline of patients with and without PCT consultation (n = 164)

Patients without PCT consultation, n Score Patients with PCT consultation, n Score
 Eortc QLQ C15 Pal
 Physical functioning* 125 40.8 28 32.4
 Emotional functioning* 124 71.1 28 71.4
 Fatigue* 124 63.1 30 78.5
 Nausea and vomiting* 125 25.3 30 44.4
 Pain* 126 48.0 30 67.8
 Dyspnea* 126 34.4 30 33.3
 Insomnia* 126 41.0 30 41.1
 Appetite loss* 126 46.8 30 57.8
 Constipation* 123 29.0 30 50.0
 Global health status* 127 50.9 29 38.5
EQ-5D**
 Dutch EQ-5D Summary Score 121 0.54 30 0.45
POS
 Physical*** 124 3.0 28 4.2
 Psychological*** 124 6.7 30 8.0
 Information*** 124 1.9 29 2.2
 Total score† 116 11.6 27 14.3
*

EORTC QLQ C15 PAL: range 0–100. For physical functioning, emotional functioning, and global health status higher score implies better status. For individual symptoms, higher score implies a severe burden of symptoms (worse status).

**

EQ-5D: range −0.33 to −1, a higher score implies better QoL.

***

Palliative Outcome Scale (POS) subscales: POS physical scale 0–12, POS psychological scale 0–20, POS information scale 0–12; a higher score implies worse outcome. † POS total scale 0–40; a higher score implies worse outcome.