TABLE 3.

Results from two regression models.

Model 1. Logistic regression model with facility-based delivery as outcomea
Variable	OR	95% CI	P
Quartile of quality of ANC score computed from PCA
Lowest	Ref
Second	2.00	1.55–2.56	<0.001
Third	3.27	2.45–4.38	<0.001
Highest	5.83	4.05–8.41	<0.001
Model 2. Linear regression model with transformed ANC quality score (from PCA) as outcomeb
Variable	Estimate	95% CI	P
Location of antenatal care
Hospital	117	94–140	<0.001
Health center	52	−7 to 111	0.083
Dispensary	Ref
Age (1-year increase)	5	3–7	<0.001
Educational level completed and participation in religious services at least weekly
No education, no weekly religious participation	−111	−146 to −77	<0.001
Primary education, no weekly religious participation	−14	−37 to 10	0.250
More than primary education, no weekly religious participation	12	−43 to 68	0.657
No education, yes weekly religious participation	−40	−59 to −20	<0.001
Primary education, yes weekly religious participation	Ref
More than primary education, yes weekly religious participation	52	25–79	<0.001
Worked outside the home in the previous year	24	7–41	0.005
Tercile of SES
First	Ref
Second	32	17–47	<0.001
Third	56	34–77	<0.001
Number of previous live births (1 birth increase)	−11	−17 to −5	<0.001
Husband is health decision-maker	−14	−31 to 3	0.110

Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; PCA, principal component analysis; SES, socioeconomic status.

^aOther model covariates include: location of ANC, age, level of education, SES tercile, number of previous livebirths, distance to nearest health facility in minutes. Sampling weights used.

^bSampling weights used.