Table 5.
Result of proposed system and comparison with methodology by using features.
Existing solution | Methodology | Features | Accuracy (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Abdel-Nasser et al. [2] | Local database + GLCM + SVM | 20 | 88.0% |
Pérez et al. [18] | DDSM + ROI + GLCM + GLCLM + Boolean vector | 19 12 | 94.9% 92.3% |
Nababan et al. [16] | Mini MIAS + WFRFT + Jaya-FNN | 18 | 92.27% |
Nababan [5] | INbreast + ROI + GLCM + SECoS | 16 | 82.98% |
Mohanty et al. [49] | DDSM + ROI + GLCM + GLCLM + decision tree | 19 12 | 96.7% 93.6% |
Ozturk et al. [42] | Shrunken features + SMOTE + PCA | 20 | 94.23% |
Proposed system | INbreast + (GLCM, LBP, LBGLCM, GLRLM, and SFTA) + ADASYN + FNN | 10 | 99.5% |