Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;2021:6671554. doi: 10.1155/2021/6671554

Table 2.

Univariable logistic regression analyses of explanatory variables of small ruminant brucellosis.

Variable Level No. tested CFT positive (%) OR 95% CI for CFT Fisher's exact test P value
District Hirna 238 0 (0) 1.0
Mieso 1334 4 (0.3) 1.36 0.61–3.03 0.449
Chiro 498 1 (0.2) 1.69 0.72–3.96 0.229
Species Sheep 1101 2 (0.18) 1.0
Goat 969 3 (0.32) 1.37 0.89–2.11 0.153
Altitude Highland 301 0 (0) 1.0
Midland 408 1 (0.25) 1.17 0.43–3.14 0.759
Lowland 1361 4 (0.3) 4.15 2.23–7.72 0.0001
Sex Male 442 1 (0.23) 1.0
Female 1628 4 (0.25) 1.04 0.61–1.79 0.884
Age Young (<1 year) 469 0 (0) 1.0
Adult (>1 year) 1601 5 (0.31) 1.53 0.86–2.74 0.152
Flock size Small 1097 2 (0.18) 1.0
Large 973 3 (0.31) 1.68 1.08–2.60 0.021
Production system Sedentary 404 0 (0) 1.0
Pastoral 1331 4 (0.3) 2.59 1.37–4.90 0.004
Agropastoral 335 1 (0.29) 4.01 2.35–6.84 0.0001
Management Extensive 1785 2 (0.1) 1.0
Semi-intensive 285 3 (1) 1.02 0.54–1.90 0.959
Mixed flock No 1002 1 (0.1) 1.0
Yes 1068 4 (0.37) 2.11 1.33–3.36 0.002