Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;12(2):490–502. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa115

TABLE 1.

Subgroup analyses for total energy intake (energy content of the supplement plus energy consumed at an ad libitum test meal), according to protein form, type, timing, quantity, type of control used, and gender analysis in healthy older adults

Number of comparisons Mean difference, kJ 95% CI Heterogeneity (I2), % P P value for subgroup difference
Total energy intake 22 649 438, 861 56 <0.00001
Protein form 0.66
 Liquid 15 685 369, 1002 62 <0.0001
 Semi-solid/solid 7 592 332, 852 42 <0.00001
Protein type 0.40
 Whey protein 13 561 242, 880 54 <0.001
 Protein through diet/whole foods/other 9 745 463, 1027 59 <0.00001
Protein timing 0.02
 Alongside meal 3 295 23, 567 0 0.03
 ≥60 min before ad libitum test meal 19 730 485, 976 57 <0.00001
Protein quantity 0.18
 ≤30 g 18 576 371, 782 50 <0.00001
 >30 g 4 1133 340, 1925 60 <0.01
Control types 0.01
 Water/flavored water 13 899 600, 1197 57 <0.00001
 Saline 3 350 −270, 971 0 0.27
 Nothing 6 340 110, 569 23 <0.01
Gender analysis <0.001
 Female-only studies 6 340 110, 569 23 <0.01
 Male-only studies 10 650 297, 1002 50 <0.001
 Both genders 6 1122 834, 1410 0 <0.00001