Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 30;11:7178. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85878-z

Table 3.

Association between nutritional patterns and 2 clinical outcomes.

Coefficient 95% Confidence Interval p value
(a)
Intercept − 1.68 [− 1.74, − 1.62] < 0.001
BW z-score 0.72 [0.64, 0.79] < 0.001
Antenatal Steroids 0.15 [− 0.07, 0.37] 0.185
Apgar 1 min 0.00 [− 0.04, 0.05] 0.861
IMD decile − 0.01 [− 0.04, 0.02] 0.588
Smoking in Pregnancy 0.05 [− 0.09, 0.19] 0.504
Sex − 0.06 [− 0.18, 0.06] 0.301
Gestational Age 0.06 [0.01, 0.11] 0.017
Midlands and east − 0.09 [− 0.27, 0.1] 0.364
North − 0.09 [− 0.27, 0.09] 0.306
South 0.02 [− 0.16, 0.21] 0.796
Nutritional Treatment − 0.33 [− 0.46, − 0.2] < 0.001
Z1 0.03 [− 0.09, 0.15] 0.641
Z2 − 0.04 [− 0.16, 0.07] 0.482
Z3 0.00 [− 0.1, 0.11] 0.940
(b)
Intercept − 0.15 [− 0.36, 0.05] 0.143
BW z-score − 0.64 [− 0.92, − 0.37] < 0.001
Antenatal Steroids 0.27 [− 0.49, 1.03] 0.491
Apgar 1 min − 0.09 [− 0.24, 0.07] 0.263
IMD decile 0.00 [− 0.15, 0.15] 0.977
Smoking in Pregnancy 0.05 [− 0.48, 0.58] 0.862
Sex − 0.58 [− 1, − 0.15] 0.008
Gestational Age − 0.43 [− 0.58, − 0.28] < 0.001
Midlands and east 0.02 [− 0.62, 0.66] 0.941
North 0.38 [− 0.27, 1.02] 0.254
South 0.42 [− 0.19, 1.04] 0.176
Nutritional Treatment − 1.16 [− 1.67, − 0.65] < 0.001
Z1 − 0.26 [− 0.66, 0.15] 0.216
Z2 0.21 [− 0.19, 0.61] 0.309
Z3 − 0.10 [− 0.54, 0.34] 0.648

Regression coefficients, 95% confidence intervals and p values are reported for all tested covariates, and the three latent variables (Z1, Z2 and Z3) of the factor model that facilitate deconfounding. We excluded infants with any missing values for the studied variables and used London as the reference category for geographical location. (a) Linear regression on weight z-score at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (W36 z-score), comparing clusters 13 (n = 371) and cluster 16 (n = 339). (b) Logistic regression on BPD, comparing cluster 17 (n = 376) to 18 (n = 283). Coefficients in (a) measure effect on the outcome by a change of one unit in the corresponding covariate. Coefficients in (b) measure change in log-odds ratio of the outcome by a change of one unit in the corresponding covariate. “Nutritional Treatment” = binary covariate encoding inclusion in one cluster versus the other. Significant (p < 0.05) covariates are highlighted in bold/italic if inducing a negative/positive effect on the outcome variable when the associated covariate is quantitatively positive.